Can detection of Braf p.V600E mutation be improved? Comparison of allele specific multiplex sequencing to present tests

T. Vinayagamoorthy, David Y. Zhang, F. Ye, Dilanthi Vinayagamoorthy, R. Hodkinson
{"title":"Can detection of Braf p.V600E mutation be improved? Comparison of allele specific multiplex sequencing to present tests","authors":"T. Vinayagamoorthy, David Y. Zhang, F. Ye, Dilanthi Vinayagamoorthy, R. Hodkinson","doi":"10.5430/JST.V7N2P14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This is an investigative study to evaluate a new companion diagnostic platform, allele specific multiplex sequencing (ASMS). Detection of Braf p.V600E from solid tumors is used as the test model with the following objectives: 1) whether ASMS can detect Braf p.V600E/K mutations from a variety of solid tumors, 2) whether ASMS can detect all Braf p.V600E from samples that were positive for Braf V600E by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent, and 3) whether ASMS can detect Braf p.V600E among samples that were reported negative by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent. Methods: ASMS is a novel modification (US Patent 6197510) of traditional Sanger sequencing, with Lower Limit of Detection (LLOD) of 20 GE (Genome Equivalent) and 0.001% sensitivity. We compared ASMS to clinical samples previously tested either by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent methods. Results: We analyzed 83 DNA extracts from FFPE samples (41 tested by SNaPshot and 42 tested by Ion Torrent). There was a total of thirty-seven samples positive for Braf p.V600E (16 by Ion Torrent; 21 by SNaPshot), and all of these samples tested positive by ASMS for Braf p.V600E. Out of the 46 negatives for Braf p.V600E (20 by SNaPshot; 26 by Ion Torrent samples), ASMS detected Braf p.V600E positive results in 10 of the SNaPshot and in 18 of the Ion Torrent negative samples. ASMS could detect both Braf p.V600E and the wild-type Braf p.V600 simultaneously with 40 pg of FFPE DNA extracts. Conclusions: ASMS assay detected all Braf p.V600E positives from different types of solid tumors that previously tested positive by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent. Further, ASMS was able to detect Braf p.V600E among samples that were reported negative by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent.","PeriodicalId":17174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Tumors","volume":"74 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V7N2P14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This is an investigative study to evaluate a new companion diagnostic platform, allele specific multiplex sequencing (ASMS). Detection of Braf p.V600E from solid tumors is used as the test model with the following objectives: 1) whether ASMS can detect Braf p.V600E/K mutations from a variety of solid tumors, 2) whether ASMS can detect all Braf p.V600E from samples that were positive for Braf V600E by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent, and 3) whether ASMS can detect Braf p.V600E among samples that were reported negative by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent. Methods: ASMS is a novel modification (US Patent 6197510) of traditional Sanger sequencing, with Lower Limit of Detection (LLOD) of 20 GE (Genome Equivalent) and 0.001% sensitivity. We compared ASMS to clinical samples previously tested either by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent methods. Results: We analyzed 83 DNA extracts from FFPE samples (41 tested by SNaPshot and 42 tested by Ion Torrent). There was a total of thirty-seven samples positive for Braf p.V600E (16 by Ion Torrent; 21 by SNaPshot), and all of these samples tested positive by ASMS for Braf p.V600E. Out of the 46 negatives for Braf p.V600E (20 by SNaPshot; 26 by Ion Torrent samples), ASMS detected Braf p.V600E positive results in 10 of the SNaPshot and in 18 of the Ion Torrent negative samples. ASMS could detect both Braf p.V600E and the wild-type Braf p.V600 simultaneously with 40 pg of FFPE DNA extracts. Conclusions: ASMS assay detected all Braf p.V600E positives from different types of solid tumors that previously tested positive by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent. Further, ASMS was able to detect Braf p.V600E among samples that were reported negative by SNaPshot or Ion Torrent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Braf p.V600E突变的检测是否可以提高?等位基因特异性多重序列与现有测试的比较
目的:本研究旨在评价一种新的伴随诊断平台——等位基因特异性多重测序(ASMS)。检测实体肿瘤Braf p.V600E作为检验模型,目的如下:1)asm能否检测出多种实体肿瘤Braf p.V600E/K突变;2)在SNaPshot或Ion Torrent检测Braf p.V600E阳性的样本中,asm能否检测出所有Braf p.V600E; 3)在SNaPshot或Ion Torrent检测阴性的样本中,asm能否检测出Braf p.V600E。方法:ASMS是传统Sanger测序的新改良(美国专利6197510),检测下限(LLOD)为20ge (Genome Equivalent),灵敏度为0.001%。我们将ASMS与先前使用SNaPshot或Ion Torrent方法测试的临床样本进行比较。结果:我们分析了83份FFPE样品的DNA提取物(41份采用SNaPshot检测,42份采用Ion Torrent检测)。共有37份样本Braf p.V600E呈阳性(16份为离子激流检测;这些样本均经asm检测为Braf p.V600E阳性。在Braf p.V600E的46张底片中(20张由SNaPshot拍摄;26个离子激流样品),asm在10个SNaPshot样品中检测到Braf p.V600E阳性结果,在18个离子激流样品中检测到阴性结果。用40 pg的FFPE DNA提取物同时检测Braf p.V600E和野生型Braf p.V600。结论:在不同类型的实体瘤中,asm检测到所有Braf p.V600E阳性,而之前的SNaPshot或Ion Torrent检测结果均为阳性。此外,asm能够在SNaPshot或Ion Torrent报告为阴性的样品中检测到Braf p.V600E。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Description of multiparametric targeting techniques for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation in refractory ventricular tachycardia: A quaternary medical center experience Prognostic significance of pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers in non-metastatic breast cancer Prognostic significance of SOX2 and GPC3 in Ameloblastoma and its malignant counterpart (Ameloblastic Carcinoma) Tumor stroma ratio as a parameter for prognosis and clinicopathological behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of PEC blocks in minimising chronic post-mastectomy pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1