Comparative Outline of the Terms “Great Unification”, “China”, and “All-under-Heaven”

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Chinese Humanities Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1163/23521341-12340136
Nianqun Yang (楊念群)
{"title":"Comparative Outline of the Terms “Great Unification”, “China”, and “All-under-Heaven”","authors":"Nianqun Yang (楊念群)","doi":"10.1163/23521341-12340136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe concepts “Great Unification” (Dayitong 大一統), “China” (Zhongguo 中國), and “all-under-Heaven” (Tianxia 天下) are all research topics which continue to attract the focus of the Chinese historical community. The three concepts are both related and different. This paper conducts a preliminary comparative analysis of the content of the three concepts and the role that they play in specific historical studies. It finds that the concept “China” emphasizes the origin of Huaxia 華夏 civilization and its significance as a center for expansion and Sinicization of surrounding ethnic groups. The concept “all-under-Heaven,” meanwhile, places more stress on the overall political governance relationship between the center and the periphery. Finally, the concept “Great Unification” focuses on the process by which a dynasty establishes its legitimacy in terms of both ideology and practice. Only by examining the three concepts together can we fully grasp the overall direction and characteristics of Chinese history.","PeriodicalId":37097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Humanities","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concepts “Great Unification” (Dayitong 大一統), “China” (Zhongguo 中國), and “all-under-Heaven” (Tianxia 天下) are all research topics which continue to attract the focus of the Chinese historical community. The three concepts are both related and different. This paper conducts a preliminary comparative analysis of the content of the three concepts and the role that they play in specific historical studies. It finds that the concept “China” emphasizes the origin of Huaxia 華夏 civilization and its significance as a center for expansion and Sinicization of surrounding ethnic groups. The concept “all-under-Heaven,” meanwhile, places more stress on the overall political governance relationship between the center and the periphery. Finally, the concept “Great Unification” focuses on the process by which a dynasty establishes its legitimacy in terms of both ideology and practice. Only by examining the three concepts together can we fully grasp the overall direction and characteristics of Chinese history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“大一统”、“中国”、“天下”之比较提纲
“大一统”、“中国”、“天下”等概念一直是中国史学界关注的研究课题。这三个概念既相关又不同。本文对这三个概念的内容及其在具体历史研究中的作用进行了初步的比较分析。研究发现,“中国”这一概念强调了华夏华夏文明的起源及其作为周边民族扩张和汉化中心的重要意义。与此同时,“天下”概念更强调中心与边缘之间的整体政治治理关系。最后,“大一统”概念关注的是一个王朝在意识形态和实践上确立其合法性的过程。只有把这三个概念放在一起考察,才能全面把握中国历史的总体方向和特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Humanities
Journal of Chinese Humanities Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Introduction: a New Discussion on Chinese Literature On a Far-Off Journey – a Commentary on the “History of Literary Culture” Approach in The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature Is a New Chinese Literary History Possible? A Critical Investigation of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature Musings on Literary History Research: The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature as a Case Study The Revealed and the Hidden: a Reading of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1