Surface Characterization and Short-term Adhesion to Zirconia after Ultra-short Pulsed Laser Irradiation.

M. Esteves-Oliveira, P. Jansen, M. Wehner, A. Dohrn, M. BeLLO-siLva, C. P. Eduardo, H. Meyer-Lueckel
{"title":"Surface Characterization and Short-term Adhesion to Zirconia after Ultra-short Pulsed Laser Irradiation.","authors":"M. Esteves-Oliveira, P. Jansen, M. Wehner, A. Dohrn, M. BeLLO-siLva, C. P. Eduardo, H. Meyer-Lueckel","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a36918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE To evaluate the suitability of an ultra-short pulsed laser (USPL) to treat zirconia ceramic surfaces and increase their adhesion to dual-curing resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty 10 × 10 × 5 mm³ blocks were prepared from a zirconia ceramic (Y-TZP). The specimens were polished and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 5) which received the following surface treatments: sandblasting (SB) with Al₂O₃ particles and silica coating (SC) with SiO₂ particles as positive controls; two groups received USPL irradiation, one with 10 scan repetitions (L10) and the other with 20 (L20). Laser irradiation was performed at 1030 nm, 2.3 J/cm², 6 ps pulse duration. The ceramic blocks were duplicated in composite resin and cemented with a dual-curing resin cement. Half of the blocks were then stored in water (37°C) for 24 h and the other half for 1 month. At each time, 40 to 60 sticks per group were subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). RESULTS Laser-treated zirconia presented statistically significantly higher roughness than did SB and SC. After 24 h, the highest bond strength means (MPa) were achieved by L10 (42.3 ± 10.8) and L20 (37.9 ± 14.4), and both of them were statistically significantly higher than SB (22.0 ± 5.3) and SC (20.8 ± 7.1) (p < 0.05). After 1 month of storage, L10- and L20-treated zirconia still showed significantly higher bond strengths than did SB- and SC-treated zirconia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION USPL irradiation significantly increases bond strength of zirconia ceramic to dual-curing resin cement and might be an alternative for improving adhesion to this material.","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"24 1","pages":"483-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the suitability of an ultra-short pulsed laser (USPL) to treat zirconia ceramic surfaces and increase their adhesion to dual-curing resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty 10 × 10 × 5 mm³ blocks were prepared from a zirconia ceramic (Y-TZP). The specimens were polished and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 5) which received the following surface treatments: sandblasting (SB) with Al₂O₃ particles and silica coating (SC) with SiO₂ particles as positive controls; two groups received USPL irradiation, one with 10 scan repetitions (L10) and the other with 20 (L20). Laser irradiation was performed at 1030 nm, 2.3 J/cm², 6 ps pulse duration. The ceramic blocks were duplicated in composite resin and cemented with a dual-curing resin cement. Half of the blocks were then stored in water (37°C) for 24 h and the other half for 1 month. At each time, 40 to 60 sticks per group were subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). RESULTS Laser-treated zirconia presented statistically significantly higher roughness than did SB and SC. After 24 h, the highest bond strength means (MPa) were achieved by L10 (42.3 ± 10.8) and L20 (37.9 ± 14.4), and both of them were statistically significantly higher than SB (22.0 ± 5.3) and SC (20.8 ± 7.1) (p < 0.05). After 1 month of storage, L10- and L20-treated zirconia still showed significantly higher bond strengths than did SB- and SC-treated zirconia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION USPL irradiation significantly increases bond strength of zirconia ceramic to dual-curing resin cement and might be an alternative for improving adhesion to this material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超短脉冲激光辐照后氧化锆的表面表征及短期粘附。
目的评价超短脉冲激光(USPL)对氧化锆陶瓷表面处理的适用性,提高其与双固化树脂水泥的附着力。材料与方法用氧化锆陶瓷(Y-TZP)制备了20个10 × 10 × 5 mm³的块体。将样品抛光并随机分为四组(n = 5),每组接受以下表面处理:用Al₂O₃颗粒喷砂(SB)和用SiO₂颗粒作为阳性对照的二氧化硅涂层(SC);两组接受USPL照射,一组扫描次数为10次(L10),另一组为20次(L20)。激光照射波长为1030 nm, 2.3 J/cm²,脉冲持续时间为6 ps。在复合树脂中复制陶瓷块,并用双固化树脂水泥进行胶结。一半的细胞块在37°C的水中保存24小时,另一半保存1个月。每次每组40 ~ 60根进行微拉伸粘结强度测试。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。结果激光处理后的氧化锆表面粗糙度明显高于SB和SC, 24 h后,L10(42.3±10.8)和L20(37.9±14.4)的结合强度平均值(MPa)最高,均高于SB(22.0±5.3)和SC(20.8±7.1)(p < 0.05)。保存1个月后,L10和l20处理的氧化锆的结合力仍显著高于SB和sc处理的氧化锆(p < 0.05)。结论uspl辐照可显著提高氧化锆陶瓷与双固化树脂水泥的结合强度,可作为提高氧化锆陶瓷与双固化树脂水泥结合强度的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrofluoric Acid in Dentistry: An Investigation of Isolation and Neutralizing Agents and Precipitates on IPS e.max CAD. Influence of Operator, Tool, Dental Loupes, and Tooth Position on Enamel Loss and Composite Remnants After Removal of Composite Attachments for Orthodontic Clear Aligners: An Experimental Study Using 3D Profilometry. Long-term Survival Rate and Clinical Quality of Individually Layered Indirect Composite Restorations in Adolescents and Young Adults. A Novel Graphite Fluoride/Bioactive Glass-containing Orthodontic Primer with Antibacterial and Remineralization Properties: An In-vitro Study. Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1