Science-Based Entrepreneurial Firms as Real Options: Assessing the Outcomes of the Norwegian Firm Population from 1995 to 2012

M. T. Mathisen, Einar Rasmussen
{"title":"Science-Based Entrepreneurial Firms as Real Options: Assessing the Outcomes of the Norwegian Firm Population from 1995 to 2012","authors":"M. T. Mathisen, Einar Rasmussen","doi":"10.1142/9789813220621_0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science-based entrepreneurial firms (SBEFs) that are set up to commercialize knowledge created in universities and other public research institutions typically face long development paths. They develop new products and services associated with high levels of technological, market, and organizational uncertainties. Despite strong interest from policy makers and universities to promote the creation of SBEFs, there is little systematic evidence on the value creation patterns and potential impacts of these firms. By using a real options approach, this study provides a detailed assessment of the portfolio of all 471 SBEFs supported by technology transfer offices, incubators and science parks in Norway from 1995 to 2012. By following an entire portfolio of firms over an extensive period of time, we overcome some of the shortcomings of prior spin-off research. The findings reveal that 97 firms in the portfolio had reached what could be considered a successful outcome, 126 had failed, while the remaining 251 may still be considered as real options with an uncertain outcome. Acquisitions appear to be an important mode of successful outcomes for these ventures; an outcome currently underexplored in the literature. The chapter concludes with implications for policy makers seeking to maximize the value creation potential of spin-offs from academic institutions.","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813220621_0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Science-based entrepreneurial firms (SBEFs) that are set up to commercialize knowledge created in universities and other public research institutions typically face long development paths. They develop new products and services associated with high levels of technological, market, and organizational uncertainties. Despite strong interest from policy makers and universities to promote the creation of SBEFs, there is little systematic evidence on the value creation patterns and potential impacts of these firms. By using a real options approach, this study provides a detailed assessment of the portfolio of all 471 SBEFs supported by technology transfer offices, incubators and science parks in Norway from 1995 to 2012. By following an entire portfolio of firms over an extensive period of time, we overcome some of the shortcomings of prior spin-off research. The findings reveal that 97 firms in the portfolio had reached what could be considered a successful outcome, 126 had failed, while the remaining 251 may still be considered as real options with an uncertain outcome. Acquisitions appear to be an important mode of successful outcomes for these ventures; an outcome currently underexplored in the literature. The chapter concludes with implications for policy makers seeking to maximize the value creation potential of spin-offs from academic institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学创业型企业作为实物期权:1995 - 2012年挪威企业人口结果评估
为将大学和其他公共研究机构创造的知识商业化而建立的基于科学的创业公司(sbef)通常面临着漫长的发展道路。他们开发的新产品和服务与技术、市场和组织的高度不确定性有关。尽管政策制定者和大学对推动创建sbef有浓厚的兴趣,但关于这些公司的价值创造模式和潜在影响的系统证据很少。本研究采用实物期权方法,对1995年至2012年由挪威技术转移办公室、孵化器和科技园支持的471家中小企业基金的投资组合进行了详细评估。通过在很长一段时间内跟踪公司的整个投资组合,我们克服了以前分拆研究的一些缺点。研究结果显示,投资组合中的97家公司已经达到了可以被认为是成功的结果,126家失败了,而剩下的251家可能仍然被认为是具有不确定结果的实物期权。收购似乎是这些企业取得成功的一个重要模式;这是目前文献中未充分探讨的结果。本章总结了政策制定者寻求最大限度地利用学术机构衍生产品的价值创造潜力的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Development Contests Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents Local Technology Adoption and Innovation: The Establishment of U.S. Airmail and the Organization of Aviation Innovation Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1