Individualization and contemporary fatherhood

A. Westerling
{"title":"Individualization and contemporary fatherhood","authors":"A. Westerling","doi":"10.20377/jfr-823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This article explores dilemmas related to contemporary fatherhood and discusses how theories of individualization enable the understanding of social change and family life.\nBackground: Theories on modernization argue that ongoing processes of individualization challenge researchers to reinvent key concepts in family sociology. The concept of intimate fatherhood allows for the exploration of men’s family practices and presents a basis for understanding what modernization means for contemporary parenthood. Intimate fatherhood can be further theorized through empirically sensitive approaches in the study of everyday family life.\nMethod: Drawing on data from a mixed-method longitudinal study comprising four waves of data from the 1968 cohort in Denmark (n = 1,414), the study analyzes qualitative interviews from the second and fourth waves. Social psychological discourse analysis of the interviews is used to explore the participants' family practices.\nResults: The analysis examines how caring intimacy in contemporary fatherhood is interwoven in a complex entanglement with other positions related to partnering and provision. Individualization is theorized as a mode of orientation in life with reference to oneself but not counterposed to social ties and family practices signified by solidarity and togetherness.\nConclusion: Individualization theory can guide analytical attention when examining contemporary fatherhood, but such analyses must remain sensitive to the complex entanglement of everyday family life.","PeriodicalId":44669,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article explores dilemmas related to contemporary fatherhood and discusses how theories of individualization enable the understanding of social change and family life. Background: Theories on modernization argue that ongoing processes of individualization challenge researchers to reinvent key concepts in family sociology. The concept of intimate fatherhood allows for the exploration of men’s family practices and presents a basis for understanding what modernization means for contemporary parenthood. Intimate fatherhood can be further theorized through empirically sensitive approaches in the study of everyday family life. Method: Drawing on data from a mixed-method longitudinal study comprising four waves of data from the 1968 cohort in Denmark (n = 1,414), the study analyzes qualitative interviews from the second and fourth waves. Social psychological discourse analysis of the interviews is used to explore the participants' family practices. Results: The analysis examines how caring intimacy in contemporary fatherhood is interwoven in a complex entanglement with other positions related to partnering and provision. Individualization is theorized as a mode of orientation in life with reference to oneself but not counterposed to social ties and family practices signified by solidarity and togetherness. Conclusion: Individualization theory can guide analytical attention when examining contemporary fatherhood, but such analyses must remain sensitive to the complex entanglement of everyday family life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性化与当代父亲身份
目的:本文探讨了与当代父亲身份相关的困境,并讨论了个体化理论如何使人们理解社会变革和家庭生活。背景:现代化理论认为,正在进行的个体化进程挑战研究者重塑家庭社会学中的关键概念。亲密父亲的概念允许探索男性的家庭实践,并提出了理解现代化对当代父母意味着什么的基础。在日常家庭生活的研究中,亲密父亲可以通过经验敏感的方法进一步理论化。方法:利用混合方法纵向研究的数据,包括丹麦1968年队列的四波数据(n = 1414),研究分析了第二和第四波的定性访谈。通过访谈的社会心理话语分析来探讨参与者的家庭实践。结果:分析考察了当代父亲的关怀亲密是如何与其他与伙伴关系和提供相关的职位交织在一起的。个体化被理论化为一种与自身相关的生活取向模式,但并不反对以团结和团聚为标志的社会联系和家庭实践。结论:个体化理论可以指导对当代父亲身份的分析,但这种分析必须对日常家庭生活的复杂纠缠保持敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender differences in the association between nonstandard work schedules and work-family conflict: A mixed methods analysis in France Transition to fatherhood and adjustments in working hours: The importance of organizational policy feedback Towards a conceptualisation of intensive parenting norms: Testing exact and approximate measurement invariance across social and country contexts Do partnership transitions affect individual perceptions of aging in later life? Findings from the German Ageing Survey and the NRW80+ study Arranging childcare in two Nordic countries: A comparison of ECEC start in Iceland and Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1