Outcomes Assessment Methodology for a Course in Probability and Random Variables

P. Shankar
{"title":"Outcomes Assessment Methodology for a Course in Probability and Random Variables","authors":"P. Shankar","doi":"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:A methodology to assess the student learning outcomes in the course \"Probability for Engineers\" has been implemented. The indirect assessment strategy relied on student surveys at the beginning and the conclusion of the course. The direct assessment was based on tracking the student scores in midterm examination I, midterm examination II, and the final examination, question by question on topics related to the learning outcomes. The enhancements in performance in three topics grouped to include all learning outcomes were monitored as the course progressed. Robustness of the quantitative measures of indirect and direct assessments was ensured through hypothesis tests. The results demonstrated that the goals of the course were met in terms of the higher level of understanding by the students at the end of the term. While there is still room for improvement, the methodology developed here can be easily extended to courses in other disciplines. Keywords: direct and indirect assessments, engineering education, engineering probability, outcomes assessment, probability and random variables","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"98 1","pages":"71 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:A methodology to assess the student learning outcomes in the course "Probability for Engineers" has been implemented. The indirect assessment strategy relied on student surveys at the beginning and the conclusion of the course. The direct assessment was based on tracking the student scores in midterm examination I, midterm examination II, and the final examination, question by question on topics related to the learning outcomes. The enhancements in performance in three topics grouped to include all learning outcomes were monitored as the course progressed. Robustness of the quantitative measures of indirect and direct assessments was ensured through hypothesis tests. The results demonstrated that the goals of the course were met in terms of the higher level of understanding by the students at the end of the term. While there is still room for improvement, the methodology developed here can be easily extended to courses in other disciplines. Keywords: direct and indirect assessments, engineering education, engineering probability, outcomes assessment, probability and random variables
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概率与随机变量课程的结果评估方法
本文提出了一种评估“工程师概率论”课程学生学习成果的方法。间接评估策略依赖于课程开始和结束时的学生调查。直接评估是基于跟踪学生在期中考试一、期中考试二和期末考试中的成绩,一题一题地跟踪与学习成果相关的主题。随着课程的进展,对三个主题(包括所有学习成果)的表现增强进行了监测。通过假设检验确保间接和直接评估的定量测量的稳健性。结果表明,就学生在学期结束时更高的理解水平而言,课程的目标已经达到。虽然仍有改进的空间,这里开发的方法可以很容易地扩展到其他学科的课程。关键词:直接评价与间接评价,工程教育,工程概率,结果评价,概率与随机变量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
期刊最新文献
Another Silo Isn’t the Answer: A Collaborative Approach to Assessment “With the Kindness Shown to Me”: Assessing Remote Teaching and Learning Strategies in a Time of Pandemic Grades and Learning It’s a Matter of Trust: Why Grades Are Persona non Grata in Assessment Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1