GTFS-Madrid-Bench: A benchmark for virtual knowledge graph access in the transport domain

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Web Semantics Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.websem.2020.100596
David Chaves-Fraga, Freddy Priyatna, Andrea Cimmino, Jhon Toledo, Edna Ruckhaus, Oscar Corcho
{"title":"GTFS-Madrid-Bench: A benchmark for virtual knowledge graph access in the transport domain","authors":"David Chaves-Fraga,&nbsp;Freddy Priyatna,&nbsp;Andrea Cimmino,&nbsp;Jhon Toledo,&nbsp;Edna Ruckhaus,&nbsp;Oscar Corcho","doi":"10.1016/j.websem.2020.100596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A large number of datasets are being made available on the Web using a variety of formats and according to diverse data models. Ontology Based Data Integration (OBDI) has been traditionally proposed as a mechanism to facilitate access to such heterogeneous datasets, providing a unified view over their data by means of ontologies. Recently, the term “Virtual Knowledge Graph Access” has begun to be used to refer to the mechanisms that provide query-based access to knowledge graphs virtually generated from heterogeneous data sources. Several OBDI engines exist in the state of the art, with overlapping capabilities but also clear differences among them (in terms of the data formats that they can deal with, mapping languages that they support, query expressivity that they allow, etc.). These engines have been evaluated with different testbeds and benchmarks. However, their heterogeneity has made it difficult to come up with a common comprehensive benchmark that allows for comparisons among them to facilitate their selection by practitioners, and more importantly, for their continuous improvement by the teams that maintain them. In this paper we present GTFS-Madrid-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate OBDI engines that can be used for the provision of access mechanisms to virtual knowledge graphs. Our proposal introduces several scenarios that aim at measuring the query capabilities, performance and scalability of all these engines, considering their heterogeneity. The data sources used in our benchmark are derived from the GTFS data files of the subway network of Madrid. They have been transformed into several formats (CSV, JSON, SQL and XML) and scaled up. The query set aims at addressing a representative number of SPARQL 1.1 features while covering usual queries that data consumers may be interested in.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Semantics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.websem.2020.100596","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826820300354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

A large number of datasets are being made available on the Web using a variety of formats and according to diverse data models. Ontology Based Data Integration (OBDI) has been traditionally proposed as a mechanism to facilitate access to such heterogeneous datasets, providing a unified view over their data by means of ontologies. Recently, the term “Virtual Knowledge Graph Access” has begun to be used to refer to the mechanisms that provide query-based access to knowledge graphs virtually generated from heterogeneous data sources. Several OBDI engines exist in the state of the art, with overlapping capabilities but also clear differences among them (in terms of the data formats that they can deal with, mapping languages that they support, query expressivity that they allow, etc.). These engines have been evaluated with different testbeds and benchmarks. However, their heterogeneity has made it difficult to come up with a common comprehensive benchmark that allows for comparisons among them to facilitate their selection by practitioners, and more importantly, for their continuous improvement by the teams that maintain them. In this paper we present GTFS-Madrid-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate OBDI engines that can be used for the provision of access mechanisms to virtual knowledge graphs. Our proposal introduces several scenarios that aim at measuring the query capabilities, performance and scalability of all these engines, considering their heterogeneity. The data sources used in our benchmark are derived from the GTFS data files of the subway network of Madrid. They have been transformed into several formats (CSV, JSON, SQL and XML) and scaled up. The query set aims at addressing a representative number of SPARQL 1.1 features while covering usual queries that data consumers may be interested in.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GTFS-Madrid-Bench:传输领域中虚拟知识图访问的基准
大量的数据集以不同的格式和不同的数据模型出现在Web上。基于本体的数据集成(OBDI)传统上被认为是一种促进访问异构数据集的机制,通过本体提供对其数据的统一视图。最近,术语“虚拟知识图访问”已经开始被用来指对从异构数据源虚拟生成的知识图提供基于查询的访问的机制。目前有几种OBDI引擎,它们具有重叠的功能,但它们之间也存在明显的差异(就它们可以处理的数据格式、它们支持的映射语言、它们允许的查询表达能力等而言)。这些引擎已经用不同的测试平台和基准进行了评估。然而,它们的异构性使得很难提出一个通用的综合基准,以便在它们之间进行比较,从而促进从业者对它们的选择,更重要的是,维护它们的团队对它们进行持续改进。在本文中,我们提出了GTFS-Madrid-Bench,这是一个评估OBDI引擎的基准,可用于提供虚拟知识图的访问机制。我们的建议引入了几个场景,旨在衡量所有这些引擎的查询能力、性能和可伸缩性,同时考虑到它们的异构性。在我们的基准测试中使用的数据源来源于马德里地铁网络的GTFS数据文件。它们已经被转换成几种格式(CSV, JSON, SQL和XML)并扩展。该查询集旨在解决SPARQL 1.1中具有代表性的一些特性,同时涵盖数据消费者可能感兴趣的常用查询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Web Semantics
Journal of Web Semantics 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Web Semantics is an interdisciplinary journal based on research and applications of various subject areas that contribute to the development of a knowledge-intensive and intelligent service Web. These areas include: knowledge technologies, ontology, agents, databases and the semantic grid, obviously disciplines like information retrieval, language technology, human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery are of major relevance as well. All aspects of the Semantic Web development are covered. The publication of large-scale experiments and their analysis is also encouraged to clearly illustrate scenarios and methods that introduce semantics into existing Web interfaces, contents and services. The journal emphasizes the publication of papers that combine theories, methods and experiments from different subject areas in order to deliver innovative semantic methods and applications.
期刊最新文献
Uniqorn: Unified question answering over RDF knowledge graphs and natural language text KAE: A property-based method for knowledge graph alignment and extension Multi-stream graph attention network for recommendation with knowledge graph Ontology design facilitating Wikibase integration — and a worked example for historical data Web3-DAO: An ontology for decentralized autonomous organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1