New paths for modelling freshwater nature futures.

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11625-023-01341-0
Lilith Kramer, Sven Teurlincx, Brenda Rashleigh, Annette B G Janssen, Jan H Janse, Kate A Brauman, Csaba Földesi, Dianneke van Wijk, Lisette N de Senerpont Domis, Sopan D Patil, Parinaz Rashidi, Perrine Hamel, James Rising, Wolf M Mooij, Jan J Kuiper
{"title":"New paths for modelling freshwater nature futures.","authors":"Lilith Kramer, Sven Teurlincx, Brenda Rashleigh, Annette B G Janssen, Jan H Janse, Kate A Brauman, Csaba Földesi, Dianneke van Wijk, Lisette N de Senerpont Domis, Sopan D Patil, Parinaz Rashidi, Perrine Hamel, James Rising, Wolf M Mooij, Jan J Kuiper","doi":"10.1007/s11625-023-01341-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Freshwater ecosystems are exceptionally rich in biodiversity and provide essential benefits to people. Yet they are disproportionately threatened compared to terrestrial and marine systems and remain underrepresented in the scenarios and models used for global environmental assessments. The Nature Futures Framework (NFF) has recently been proposed to advance the contribution of scenarios and models for environmental assessments. This framework places the diverse relationships between people and nature at its core, identifying three value perspectives as points of departure: Nature for Nature, Nature for Society, and Nature as Culture. We explore how the NFF may be implemented for improved assessment of freshwater ecosystems. First, we outline how the NFF and its main value perspectives can be translated to freshwater systems and explore what desirable freshwater futures would look like from each of the above perspectives. Second, we review scenario strategies and current models to examine how freshwater modelling can be linked to the NFF in terms of its aims and outcomes. In doing so, we also identify which aspects of the NFF framework are not yet captured in current freshwater models and suggest possible ways to bridge them. Our analysis provides future directions for a more holistic freshwater model and scenario development and demonstrates how society can benefit from freshwater modelling efforts that are integrated with the value-perspectives of the NFF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":"100 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01341-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are exceptionally rich in biodiversity and provide essential benefits to people. Yet they are disproportionately threatened compared to terrestrial and marine systems and remain underrepresented in the scenarios and models used for global environmental assessments. The Nature Futures Framework (NFF) has recently been proposed to advance the contribution of scenarios and models for environmental assessments. This framework places the diverse relationships between people and nature at its core, identifying three value perspectives as points of departure: Nature for Nature, Nature for Society, and Nature as Culture. We explore how the NFF may be implemented for improved assessment of freshwater ecosystems. First, we outline how the NFF and its main value perspectives can be translated to freshwater systems and explore what desirable freshwater futures would look like from each of the above perspectives. Second, we review scenario strategies and current models to examine how freshwater modelling can be linked to the NFF in terms of its aims and outcomes. In doing so, we also identify which aspects of the NFF framework are not yet captured in current freshwater models and suggest possible ways to bridge them. Our analysis provides future directions for a more holistic freshwater model and scenario development and demonstrates how society can benefit from freshwater modelling efforts that are integrated with the value-perspectives of the NFF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟淡水自然未来的新途径。
淡水生态系统具有极其丰富的生物多样性,为人类提供了必不可少的惠益。然而,与陆地和海洋系统相比,它们受到的威胁不成比例,在用于全球环境评估的情景和模式中,它们的代表性仍然不足。最近提出了自然未来框架(NFF),以促进情景和模型对环境评估的贡献。该框架以人与自然之间的多种关系为核心,确定了三种价值视角作为出发点:自然为自然、自然为社会和自然作为文化。我们探讨了如何实施NFF来改进淡水生态系统的评估。首先,我们概述了NFF及其主要价值视角如何转化为淡水系统,并从上述每个视角探索了理想的淡水未来。其次,我们回顾了情景策略和当前模型,以研究淡水建模如何在其目标和结果方面与NFF联系起来。在此过程中,我们还确定了NFF框架的哪些方面尚未在当前的淡水模型中被捕获,并提出了可能的方法来弥合它们。我们的分析为更全面的淡水模型和情景发展提供了未来的方向,并展示了社会如何从与NFF的价值观点相结合的淡水建模工作中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Beyond the urban shift: towards a relational degrowth spatial politics. Impact of land transformation, management and governance on subjective wellbeing across social-ecological systems. Roles of researchers in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research: a reflection tool. Institutional logics as an object of change: the experiences of a water organization using design thinking for climate adaptation in a multi-stakeholder process. Achieving net-zero agriculture in Africa: perspective on policies, challenges, and opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1