Participatory impact assessment of public policies on rural development in Colombia and Mexico

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural Pub Date : 2016-12-20 DOI:10.11144/JAVERIANA.CDR13-78.PIAP
Fabio Alberto Pachón Ariza, W. Bokelmann, C. Miranda
{"title":"Participatory impact assessment of public policies on rural development in Colombia and Mexico","authors":"Fabio Alberto Pachón Ariza, W. Bokelmann, C. Miranda","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANA.CDR13-78.PIAP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The participation of stakeholders in the design and application of rural development policies is one of the major concerns of policy makers. The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) is a methodology to measure the impact of policies, which could include different stakeholders. This paper used FoPIA to assess the impact of rural development policies in Mexico and Colombia. The results showed a positive impact in the case of Mexico, whereas in Colombia, just one of the policies showed positive results. In both cases, social themes were remarked in order to take them into account at the moment of designing rural development policies.","PeriodicalId":50611,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural","volume":"59 1","pages":"143-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.CDR13-78.PIAP","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The participation of stakeholders in the design and application of rural development policies is one of the major concerns of policy makers. The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) is a methodology to measure the impact of policies, which could include different stakeholders. This paper used FoPIA to assess the impact of rural development policies in Mexico and Colombia. The results showed a positive impact in the case of Mexico, whereas in Colombia, just one of the policies showed positive results. In both cases, social themes were remarked in order to take them into account at the moment of designing rural development policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚和墨西哥农村发展公共政策参与性影响评估
利益相关者参与农村发展政策的设计和实施是政策制定者关注的主要问题之一。参与式影响评估框架(foia)是一种衡量政策影响的方法,可以包括不同的利益相关者。本文利用foia来评估墨西哥和哥伦比亚农村发展政策的影响。结果显示,在墨西哥的情况下产生了积极影响,而在哥伦比亚,只有一项政策显示出积极效果。在这两种情况下,都提到了社会主题,以便在设计农村发展政策时考虑到这些主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural
Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista tiene como tema general todos los aspectos que se tejen alrededor del desarrollo rural en el contexto colombiano, iberoamericano y mundial. Enfoca sus diferentes artículos en temas relacionados con políticas agrícolas, economía agraria, problemas rurales, gestión ambiental, innovación y cambio tecnológico y, en general, todos los aspectos que se tejen alrededor del desarrollo rural en el contexto colombiano e iberoamericano.
期刊最新文献
Reflexiones acerca del pensamiento cooperativista de Alexander Chayanov a partir de casos de estudio en Argentina rol del investigador agropecuario en el marco de procesos de innovación agropecuaria: tensión entre prácticas reales e ideales Analysis of CSR in Costa Rica Agribusiness: Its influence on Cooperation, Innovation and Performance. territorialidad de las culturas amerindígenas ante el paradigma extractivista. Sibundoy y Wirikuta en el siglo XXI. Exploring the Rural Tourism Perception of Local People and Farmers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1