Poaching Workers in a Supply Chain: Enemy from Within?

Evan Barlow, Gad Allon, Achal Bassamboo
{"title":"Poaching Workers in a Supply Chain: Enemy from Within?","authors":"Evan Barlow, Gad Allon, Achal Bassamboo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poaching is the prevalent practice of recruiting workers who are already employed elsewhere. Economy-wide, it represents the primary mode by which workers flow directly from one firm to another. In this paper, we examine the interaction between the flow of goods and the flow of workers (via poaching) between firms linked in a supply chain. We find that the direction of worker poaching between supply chain partners can run counter to classical labor economics results. Specifically, in a supply chain, the less productive firm may offer its workers higher wages and poach workers from the more productive firm. We also find that worker flows accomplished via poaching impact supply chain management. First, we find that the identity of supply chain bottleneck may depend on whether poaching is available as a means to accomplish worker flows. Next, we find that the benefits of worker flows between supply chain partners in some cases outweigh the costs incurred, so no-poaching agreements would be worse for some supply chains. This net benefit of poaching between members of a supply chain is robust to the presence of outside labor market competitors as long as the competitors do not have high productivity. Thus, poaching workers from supply chain partners can often increase the benefit of operating in manufacturing hubs for all supply chain members.","PeriodicalId":82888,"journal":{"name":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2560084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poaching is the prevalent practice of recruiting workers who are already employed elsewhere. Economy-wide, it represents the primary mode by which workers flow directly from one firm to another. In this paper, we examine the interaction between the flow of goods and the flow of workers (via poaching) between firms linked in a supply chain. We find that the direction of worker poaching between supply chain partners can run counter to classical labor economics results. Specifically, in a supply chain, the less productive firm may offer its workers higher wages and poach workers from the more productive firm. We also find that worker flows accomplished via poaching impact supply chain management. First, we find that the identity of supply chain bottleneck may depend on whether poaching is available as a means to accomplish worker flows. Next, we find that the benefits of worker flows between supply chain partners in some cases outweigh the costs incurred, so no-poaching agreements would be worse for some supply chains. This net benefit of poaching between members of a supply chain is robust to the presence of outside labor market competitors as long as the competitors do not have high productivity. Thus, poaching workers from supply chain partners can often increase the benefit of operating in manufacturing hubs for all supply chain members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在供应链中挖人:来自内部的敌人?
偷猎是一种普遍的做法,即招募已经在其他地方工作的工人。在整个经济范围内,它代表了工人直接从一家公司流向另一家公司的主要模式。在本文中,我们研究了供应链中企业之间的货物流动和工人流动(通过挖角)之间的相互作用。我们发现,供应链合作伙伴之间偷猎工人的方向可能与经典的劳动经济学结果背道而驰。具体来说,在供应链中,生产率较低的公司可能会给工人提供更高的工资,并从生产率较高的公司挖走工人。我们还发现,通过偷猎实现的工人流动会影响供应链管理。首先,我们发现供应链瓶颈的身份可能取决于挖角是否可用作为实现工人流动的手段。接下来,我们发现,在某些情况下,供应链合作伙伴之间的工人流动带来的好处超过了产生的成本,因此,无挖角协议对某些供应链来说更糟糕。只要竞争对手的生产率不高,供应链成员之间挖角的净收益对外部劳动力市场竞争对手的存在是强劲的。因此,从供应链合作伙伴那里挖走工人通常可以增加所有供应链成员在制造中心运营的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Noise to Bias: Overconfidence in New Product Forecasting Improving the accuracy of project schedules Designing Freemium with Usage Limitation: When Is It a Viable Strategy? Sales Policies for a Virtual Assistant Online Business and Marketplaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1