Fanfrolico and After: The Lindsay Aesthetic in the Cultural Cold War

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modernist Cultures Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.3366/mod.2020.0297
J. Connor
{"title":"Fanfrolico and After: The Lindsay Aesthetic in the Cultural Cold War","authors":"J. Connor","doi":"10.3366/mod.2020.0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article follows Jack Lindsay (1900–1990) in his transformation from an Australian anti-modernist to a British-based Communist and cultural Cold Warrior. Lindsay was the driving force behind a cluster of initiatives in 1920s Sydney and London to propagate the art and ideas of his father, the painter Norman Lindsay. These included the deluxe limited edition Fanfrolico Press and the little magazines Vision and The London Aphrodite. The article reconstructs the terms of Lindsay's anti-modernist polemics and the paradoxically modernist forms they took, but it also attends to his change of heart. In the two decades after the Second World War, Lindsay found himself defending modernism against both its Cold War co-optation as the in-house aesthetic of the capitalist ‘Free World’ and its reflex denigration within Soviet and international Communist aesthetics. Against the elevation of modernism in the Anglo-American academy and its cultural-diplomatic deployment by agencies of the state, against the uncritical celebration of realism and its Soviet-sphere derivatives, Lindsay proposed a subaltern tradition of experimental art characterised by its utopian symbolism and national-popular inflection. For Lindsay, this tradition reached back to Elizabethan times, but it included modernism as one of its moments. From the vantage of the Cold War, Lindsay now identified the Fanfrolico project as itself an ‘Australian modernism,’ elements of which might yet fuse to form a more perfect socialist realism.","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"13 1","pages":"276-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2020.0297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article follows Jack Lindsay (1900–1990) in his transformation from an Australian anti-modernist to a British-based Communist and cultural Cold Warrior. Lindsay was the driving force behind a cluster of initiatives in 1920s Sydney and London to propagate the art and ideas of his father, the painter Norman Lindsay. These included the deluxe limited edition Fanfrolico Press and the little magazines Vision and The London Aphrodite. The article reconstructs the terms of Lindsay's anti-modernist polemics and the paradoxically modernist forms they took, but it also attends to his change of heart. In the two decades after the Second World War, Lindsay found himself defending modernism against both its Cold War co-optation as the in-house aesthetic of the capitalist ‘Free World’ and its reflex denigration within Soviet and international Communist aesthetics. Against the elevation of modernism in the Anglo-American academy and its cultural-diplomatic deployment by agencies of the state, against the uncritical celebration of realism and its Soviet-sphere derivatives, Lindsay proposed a subaltern tradition of experimental art characterised by its utopian symbolism and national-popular inflection. For Lindsay, this tradition reached back to Elizabethan times, but it included modernism as one of its moments. From the vantage of the Cold War, Lindsay now identified the Fanfrolico project as itself an ‘Australian modernism,’ elements of which might yet fuse to form a more perfect socialist realism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文讲述了杰克·林赛(Jack Lindsay, 1900-1990)从澳大利亚的反现代主义者转变为英国的共产主义者和文化冷战斗士的过程。20世纪20年代,林赛在悉尼和伦敦发起了一系列倡议,宣传他父亲、画家诺曼·林赛(Norman Lindsay)的艺术和思想。其中包括豪华限量版的《Fanfrolico Press》和小杂志《Vision》和《the London Aphrodite》。本文重构了林德赛反现代主义论战的术语及其所采取的矛盾的现代主义形式,但也关注了他内心的变化。在第二次世界大战后的二十年里,林赛发现自己在捍卫现代主义,反对它作为资本主义“自由世界”内部美学的冷战同化,以及它在苏联和国际共产主义美学中的反射诋毁。针对现代主义在英美学术界的提升及其国家机构的文化外交部署,针对现实主义及其苏联范围衍生品的不加批判的庆祝,林赛提出了一种以乌托邦象征主义和民族流行变化为特征的实验艺术的下层传统。对林赛来说,这种传统可以追溯到伊丽莎白时代,但它包括现代主义作为它的一个时刻。从冷战的有利条件来看,Lindsay现在将Fanfrolico项目本身视为“澳大利亚现代主义”,其元素可能会融合形成更完美的社会主义现实主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modernist Cultures
Modernist Cultures HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Notes on Contributors Outside Joke: Virginia Woolf’s Freshwater and Coterie Insularity Black lives and peripatetic practice in Sylvia Townsend Warner’s Summer Will Show and David Garnett’s The Sailor’s Return ‘The novel is going to rediscover itself’: Dorothy Richardson, The Freewoman, and Individual Expression Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1