An investigation into shapes and determinants of deindustrialization processes: Theory and evidence for developed and developing countries (1970–2017)

Elisangela Araujo , Eliane Araújo , Samuel C. Peres , Lionello F. Punzo
{"title":"An investigation into shapes and determinants of deindustrialization processes: Theory and evidence for developed and developing countries (1970–2017)","authors":"Elisangela Araujo ,&nbsp;Eliane Araújo ,&nbsp;Samuel C. Peres ,&nbsp;Lionello F. Punzo","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper theoretically and empirically investigates deindustrialization in a group of selected countries, from 1970 to 2017, viewing it as a process of varied and complex causes, sensitive to the degree of economic development. Supported by the theoretical framework on the centrality of the manufacturing industry for economic growth and the contextualization of recent trends in global industry, we seek to understand empirically the main determinants of deindustrialization through an econometric model of panel data analysis. The main objective, which is also the main contribution of this research, is to empirically investigate the determinants of deindustrialization considering the degree of development of the countries and with the understanding that the causes of this process can differ substantially. Our main results, in general, were aligned with the theoretical and empirical literature on the topic, while corroborating the hypothesis that certain variables are dependent on the level of economic development. In less developed countries, the exchange rate (depreciation) is correlated positively with the value added of the manufacturing sector, as is trade openness but in a negative way. In advanced countries, on the other hand, the relocation of physical production and the degree of financialization are highlighted as factors that negatively affect the manufacturing value added, while trade openness is positive. In view of these results, a more critical analysis on the causes and costs of deindustrialization is considered important, especially in developing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 129-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.econ.2021.03.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper theoretically and empirically investigates deindustrialization in a group of selected countries, from 1970 to 2017, viewing it as a process of varied and complex causes, sensitive to the degree of economic development. Supported by the theoretical framework on the centrality of the manufacturing industry for economic growth and the contextualization of recent trends in global industry, we seek to understand empirically the main determinants of deindustrialization through an econometric model of panel data analysis. The main objective, which is also the main contribution of this research, is to empirically investigate the determinants of deindustrialization considering the degree of development of the countries and with the understanding that the causes of this process can differ substantially. Our main results, in general, were aligned with the theoretical and empirical literature on the topic, while corroborating the hypothesis that certain variables are dependent on the level of economic development. In less developed countries, the exchange rate (depreciation) is correlated positively with the value added of the manufacturing sector, as is trade openness but in a negative way. In advanced countries, on the other hand, the relocation of physical production and the degree of financialization are highlighted as factors that negatively affect the manufacturing value added, while trade openness is positive. In view of these results, a more critical analysis on the causes and costs of deindustrialization is considered important, especially in developing countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去工业化进程的形态和决定因素研究:发达国家和发展中国家的理论和证据(1970-2017)
本文从理论和实证两方面考察了1970年至2017年一组选定国家的去工业化,将其视为一个由多种复杂原因组成的过程,对经济发展程度很敏感。在制造业对经济增长的中心地位的理论框架和全球工业近期趋势的背景下,我们试图通过面板数据分析的计量经济模型从经验上理解去工业化的主要决定因素。主要目标,也是这项研究的主要贡献,是考虑到各国的发展程度,并了解到这一进程的原因可能有很大不同,以经验调查去工业化的决定因素。总的来说,我们的主要结果与有关该主题的理论和实证文献一致,同时证实了某些变量依赖于经济发展水平的假设。在欠发达国家,汇率(贬值)与制造业增加值呈正相关,贸易开放程度也是如此,但呈负相关。而在发达国家,实物生产转移和金融化程度是制造业增加值的负向影响因素,而贸易开放度是正向影响因素。鉴于这些结果,人们认为对非工业化的原因和代价进行更批判性的分析是重要的,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smoking effects on labor income: new evidence for Brazil Contagion by COVID-19 in the cities: commuting distance and residential density matter? Commodity prices and business cycles in small open economies: the role of news shocks Workers’ mobility across occupations: Complementary insights from the human capital, migration and social stratification literature. IFC - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1