MUX: algorithm selection for software model checkers

Varun Tulsian, Aditya Kanade, Rahul Kumar, A. Lal, A. Nori
{"title":"MUX: algorithm selection for software model checkers","authors":"Varun Tulsian, Aditya Kanade, Rahul Kumar, A. Lal, A. Nori","doi":"10.1145/2597073.2597080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing complexity of modern day software, software model checking has become a critical technology for ensuring correctness of software. As is true with any promising technology, there are a number of tools for software model checking. However, their respective performance trade-offs are difficult to characterize accurately – making it difficult for practitioners to select a suitable tool for the task at hand. This paper proposes a technique called MUX that addresses the problem of selecting the most suitable software model checker for a given input instance. MUX performs machine learning on a repository of software verification instances. The algorithm selector, synthesized through machine learning, uses structural features from an input instance, comprising a program-property pair, at runtime and determines which tool to use. \n We have implemented MUX for Windows device drivers and evaluated it on a number of drivers and model checkers. Our results are promising in that the algorithm selector not only avoids a significant number of timeouts but also improves the total runtime by a large margin, compared to any individual model checker. It also outperforms a portfolio-based algorithm selector being used in Microsoft at present. Besides, MUX identifies structural features of programs that are key factors in determining performance of model checkers.","PeriodicalId":6621,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"27 1","pages":"132-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

With the growing complexity of modern day software, software model checking has become a critical technology for ensuring correctness of software. As is true with any promising technology, there are a number of tools for software model checking. However, their respective performance trade-offs are difficult to characterize accurately – making it difficult for practitioners to select a suitable tool for the task at hand. This paper proposes a technique called MUX that addresses the problem of selecting the most suitable software model checker for a given input instance. MUX performs machine learning on a repository of software verification instances. The algorithm selector, synthesized through machine learning, uses structural features from an input instance, comprising a program-property pair, at runtime and determines which tool to use. We have implemented MUX for Windows device drivers and evaluated it on a number of drivers and model checkers. Our results are promising in that the algorithm selector not only avoids a significant number of timeouts but also improves the total runtime by a large margin, compared to any individual model checker. It also outperforms a portfolio-based algorithm selector being used in Microsoft at present. Besides, MUX identifies structural features of programs that are key factors in determining performance of model checkers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MUX:软件模型检查器算法选择
随着现代软件的日益复杂,软件模型检查已成为保证软件正确性的一项关键技术。与任何有前途的技术一样,有许多用于软件模型检查的工具。然而,它们各自的性能权衡很难准确地表征——这使得从业者很难为手头的任务选择合适的工具。本文提出了一种称为MUX的技术,它解决了为给定输入实例选择最合适的软件模型检查器的问题。MUX在软件验证实例的存储库上执行机器学习。算法选择器通过机器学习合成,在运行时使用输入实例的结构特征,包括程序-属性对,并确定使用哪个工具。我们已经为Windows设备驱动程序实现了MUX,并在许多驱动程序和模型检查器上对其进行了评估。我们的结果很有希望,因为算法选择器不仅避免了大量的超时,而且与任何单独的模型检查器相比,还大大提高了总运行时间。它也优于微软目前使用的基于投资组合的算法选择器。此外,MUX识别程序的结构特征,这些结构特征是决定模型检查器性能的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MSR '20: 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 29-30 June, 2020 Who you gonna call?: analyzing web requests in Android applications Cena słońca w projektowaniu architektonicznym Multi-extract and Multi-level Dataset of Mozilla Issue Tracking History Interactive Exploration of Developer Interaction Traces using a Hidden Markov Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1