Development and demonstration of a method for assessing learners' English speaking ability

Natsumi Onaka, Daniel Newbury, Jacob B Petersen
{"title":"Development and demonstration of a method for assessing learners' English speaking ability","authors":"Natsumi Onaka, Daniel Newbury, Jacob B Petersen","doi":"10.21820/23987073.2023.1.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beyond the four basic language skills – speaking, listening, reading and writing – other communication skills, including body language and eye contact, are important for communication and should be included as rating criteria in the assessment of interaction. Also, using\n technology in novel ways for purposes such as remote assessment is possible in the 21st century. Professor Natsumi Onaka, Associate Professor Daniel Newbury and Associate Professor Jacob B Petersen are striving to create a cost-effective peer-to-peer interaction English assessment system that\n supports foreign language education and testing through widely-used technology and an assessment system that places interaction as central to effective communication. In the context of globalisation, Onaka, International Education Center, Iwate University, Japan, believes that the focus of\n English education should be meaningful interaction rather than rote memorization of grammar and vocabulary for testing purposes. She is heading up this research and is a proponent of 'spontaneous interaction'. She and the team are developing a simple and standardised method for evaluating\n English-speaking skills by creating tasks and related rubrics focused on interactional situations. Videos of a subject's English speech and communication are recorded and stored in a Learning Management System (LMS) and then evaluated by a third-party, off-site evaluator. The focus is on CEFR\n (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) A2 to B1 level speaking skills. By focusing on novice-level interaction, the researchers are able to observe nascent interactional competence among university-aged students and they are attempting to apply some rating criteria to identify\n differences in ability. By using video as the text format, non-verbal communication such as gestures can be taken into consideration, along with important traditional factors such as grammatical accuracy.","PeriodicalId":88895,"journal":{"name":"IMPACT magazine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMPACT magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2023.1.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beyond the four basic language skills – speaking, listening, reading and writing – other communication skills, including body language and eye contact, are important for communication and should be included as rating criteria in the assessment of interaction. Also, using technology in novel ways for purposes such as remote assessment is possible in the 21st century. Professor Natsumi Onaka, Associate Professor Daniel Newbury and Associate Professor Jacob B Petersen are striving to create a cost-effective peer-to-peer interaction English assessment system that supports foreign language education and testing through widely-used technology and an assessment system that places interaction as central to effective communication. In the context of globalisation, Onaka, International Education Center, Iwate University, Japan, believes that the focus of English education should be meaningful interaction rather than rote memorization of grammar and vocabulary for testing purposes. She is heading up this research and is a proponent of 'spontaneous interaction'. She and the team are developing a simple and standardised method for evaluating English-speaking skills by creating tasks and related rubrics focused on interactional situations. Videos of a subject's English speech and communication are recorded and stored in a Learning Management System (LMS) and then evaluated by a third-party, off-site evaluator. The focus is on CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) A2 to B1 level speaking skills. By focusing on novice-level interaction, the researchers are able to observe nascent interactional competence among university-aged students and they are attempting to apply some rating criteria to identify differences in ability. By using video as the text format, non-verbal communication such as gestures can be taken into consideration, along with important traditional factors such as grammatical accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和示范一种评估学习者英语口语能力的方法
除了四种基本的语言技能——说、听、读、写——其他的沟通技巧,包括肢体语言和眼神交流,对沟通也很重要,应该作为评估互动的评分标准。此外,在21世纪,以新颖的方式将技术用于远程评估等目的是可能的。Natsumi Onaka教授、Daniel Newbury副教授和Jacob B Petersen副教授正在努力创建一个具有成本效益的点对点互动英语评估系统,该系统通过广泛使用的技术和将互动作为有效沟通中心的评估系统来支持外语教育和测试。在全球化的背景下,日本岩手大学国际教育中心的Onaka认为,英语教育的重点应该是有意义的互动,而不是为了考试而死记硬背语法和词汇。她是这项研究的负责人,也是“自发互动”的支持者。她和她的团队正在开发一种简单而标准化的方法来评估英语技能,方法是在互动情境中创建任务和相关的规则。受试者的英语演讲和交流视频被记录并存储在学习管理系统(LMS)中,然后由第三方,非现场评估员进行评估。重点是CEFR(欧洲共同语言参考框架)A2到B1水平的口语技能。通过关注新手水平的互动,研究人员能够观察到大学生新生的互动能力,他们试图应用一些评级标准来识别能力的差异。通过使用视频作为文本格式,可以考虑非语言交流,如手势,以及重要的传统因素,如语法准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ongoing collaborative project for building a symbiotic society with dementia: the analysis of Alzheimerâ–™s pathogenic changes by 'ageing' of disease-relevant proteins. Building a versatile medical test system in a pandemic Examining the role of forensic nursing for the needs of bereaved family care and the nursing record system Exploring educational program for specialisation of the primary care nursing role Establishing a predictive model for unsafe driving in the elderly using artificial intelligence and elucidating the neural basis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1