Shear strength of match-cast-free dry joint in precast girders

IF 2.9 4区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Concrete Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.12989/CAC.2020.26.2.161
Haibo Jiang, Jiahui Feng, Jie Xiao, Mingzhu Chen, Weibin Liang
{"title":"Shear strength of match-cast-free dry joint in precast girders","authors":"Haibo Jiang, Jiahui Feng, Jie Xiao, Mingzhu Chen, Weibin Liang","doi":"10.12989/CAC.2020.26.2.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shear keys in precast concrete segmental bridges (PCSBs) are usually match-casting which is very labour intensive. In this research, an innovative match-casting-free construction was proposed by leaving small gap between the convex and the concave castellated shear keys in the joints of PCSBs. Specimen experiment, shear strength analysis and numerical simulation were conducted, investigating the loading performance of this new type of dry joints, the gap dry joints. Compared with matchcasting joint specimens, it has been found from experiment that shear capacity of gap joint specimens significantly decreased ranging from 17.75% to 42.43% due to only partially constrained and contacted in case of gap dry joints. Through numerical simulation, the effects of bottom contacting location, the heights of the gap and the shear key base were analyzed to investigate strength reduction and methods to enhance shear capacity of gap joint specimens. Numerical results proved that shear capacity of gap dry joints under full contact condition was higher than that under partial contact. In addition, left contact destroyed the integrity of shear keys, resulting in significant strength reduction. Larger shear key base remarkably increased shear capacity of the gap joint. Experimental tests indicated that AASHTO provision underestimated shear capacity of the match-casting dry joint specimens, while the numerical results for the gap dry joint showed that AASHTO provision underestimated shear capacity of full contact specimens, but overestimated that of left contact specimens.","PeriodicalId":50625,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Concrete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/CAC.2020.26.2.161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Shear keys in precast concrete segmental bridges (PCSBs) are usually match-casting which is very labour intensive. In this research, an innovative match-casting-free construction was proposed by leaving small gap between the convex and the concave castellated shear keys in the joints of PCSBs. Specimen experiment, shear strength analysis and numerical simulation were conducted, investigating the loading performance of this new type of dry joints, the gap dry joints. Compared with matchcasting joint specimens, it has been found from experiment that shear capacity of gap joint specimens significantly decreased ranging from 17.75% to 42.43% due to only partially constrained and contacted in case of gap dry joints. Through numerical simulation, the effects of bottom contacting location, the heights of the gap and the shear key base were analyzed to investigate strength reduction and methods to enhance shear capacity of gap joint specimens. Numerical results proved that shear capacity of gap dry joints under full contact condition was higher than that under partial contact. In addition, left contact destroyed the integrity of shear keys, resulting in significant strength reduction. Larger shear key base remarkably increased shear capacity of the gap joint. Experimental tests indicated that AASHTO provision underestimated shear capacity of the match-casting dry joint specimens, while the numerical results for the gap dry joint showed that AASHTO provision underestimated shear capacity of full contact specimens, but overestimated that of left contact specimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预制梁无配浇干缝抗剪强度研究
预制混凝土节段桥的剪力键通常采用匹配浇筑,劳动强度大。在本研究中,提出了一种创新的无配铸结构,即在pcb板接头的凸形和凹形剪切键之间留下很小的间隙。通过试件试验、抗剪强度分析和数值模拟,研究了这种新型干缝的加载性能。试验发现,与匹配浇筑节理试件相比,在裂隙干缝情况下,由于仅局部约束和接触,裂隙节理试件的抗剪承载力显著降低,降幅在17.75% ~ 42.43%之间。通过数值模拟,分析了底部接触位置、缝隙高度和剪切键基对接缝试件强度降低的影响,探讨了提高接缝试件抗剪能力的方法。数值结果表明,裂隙干接头在完全接触条件下的抗剪能力高于部分接触条件下的抗剪能力。此外,左接触破坏了剪切键的完整性,导致强度显著降低。较大的剪切键基显著提高了缝节点的抗剪能力。试验结果表明,AASHTO对匹配浇筑干节理试件的抗剪承载力存在低估,而对间隙干节理的数值计算结果表明,AASHTO对完全接触试件的抗剪承载力存在低估,对左侧接触试件的抗剪承载力存在高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Concrete
Computers and Concrete 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: Computers and Concrete is An International Journal that focuses on the computer applications in be considered suitable for publication in the journal. The journal covers the topics related to computational mechanics of concrete and modeling of concrete structures including plasticity fracture mechanics creep thermo-mechanics dynamic effects reliability and safety concepts automated design procedures stochastic mechanics performance under extreme conditions.
期刊最新文献
Numerical investigation on RC T-beams strengthened in the negative moment region using NSM FRP rods at various depth of embedment Forced vibration analysis of a micro sandwich plate with an isotropic/orthotropic cores and polymeric nanocomposite face sheets Influence of non-persistent joint sets on the failure behaviour of concrete under uniaxial compression test Nonlinear vibration behavior of hybrid multi-scale cylindrical panels via semi numerical method Improving the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames using an innovative metallic-shear damper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1