What do people think about technological enhancements of human beings? An introductory study using the Technological Enhancements Questionnaire in the context of values, the scientistic worldview, and the accepted versions of humanism.

IF 0.9 3区 生物学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY International Review of Hydrobiology Pub Date : 2021-11-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2021.110061
Daniel Stefański, Łukasz Jach
{"title":"What do people think about technological enhancements of human beings? An introductory study using the Technological Enhancements Questionnaire in the context of values, the scientistic worldview, and the accepted versions of humanism.","authors":"Daniel Stefański, Łukasz Jach","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2021.110061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid development of technologies increases the possibility of technological enhancements of human beings, e.g., in their cognitive skills or physical fitness. Attitudes towards such enhancements may result in their social acceptance or rejection.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>One hundred and thirty-nine young Polish adults participated in the study. Participants completed the designed Technological Enhancements Questionnaire (TEQ) and questionnaires to measure values, the scientistic worldview, and the accepted versions of humanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed a one-dimensional TEQ structure and its satisfactory reliability. Attitudes towards technological enhancements correlated positively with achievement, self-direction in thought, power over resources, the scientistic worldview, and the evolutionary version of humanism. They also correlated negatively with tradition and the liberal version of humanism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEQ questionnaire is a short, reliable tool to measure attitudes towards technological enhancements. This preliminary study provided some significant results, but future work to validate the questionnaire is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54928,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Hydrobiology","volume":"66 1","pages":"71-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.110061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid development of technologies increases the possibility of technological enhancements of human beings, e.g., in their cognitive skills or physical fitness. Attitudes towards such enhancements may result in their social acceptance or rejection.

Participants and procedure: One hundred and thirty-nine young Polish adults participated in the study. Participants completed the designed Technological Enhancements Questionnaire (TEQ) and questionnaires to measure values, the scientistic worldview, and the accepted versions of humanism.

Results: The study showed a one-dimensional TEQ structure and its satisfactory reliability. Attitudes towards technological enhancements correlated positively with achievement, self-direction in thought, power over resources, the scientistic worldview, and the evolutionary version of humanism. They also correlated negatively with tradition and the liberal version of humanism.

Conclusions: The TEQ questionnaire is a short, reliable tool to measure attitudes towards technological enhancements. This preliminary study provided some significant results, but future work to validate the questionnaire is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们如何看待技术对人类的改进?在价值观、科学主义世界观和公认的人文主义版本的背景下,运用技术提升问卷进行介绍性研究
通讯作者- Łukasz Jach, Ph.D.,西里西亚大学,53 Grażyńskiego Str., 40-126卡托维兹,波兰,E -mail: lukasz.jach@us.edu.pl作者贡献- A:研究设计·B:数据收集·C:统计分析·D:数据解释·E:稿件准备·F:文献检索·G:论文引用资金筹集- Stefański, D., & Jach, Ł。(2021)。人们如何看待科技对人类的提升?在价值观、科学主义世界观和公认的人文主义版本的背景下使用技术增强问卷的介绍性研究。人格心理学的最新问题。收到02.04.2021·审稿10.06.2021·接受06.08.2021·发表28.10.2021原创文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Hydrobiology
International Review of Hydrobiology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: As human populations grow across the planet, water security, biodiversity loss and the loss of aquatic ecosystem services take on ever increasing priority for policy makers. International Review of Hydrobiology brings together in one forum fundamental and problem-oriented research on the challenges facing marine and freshwater biology in an economically changing world. Interdisciplinary in nature, articles cover all aspects of aquatic ecosystems, ranging from headwater streams to the ocean and biodiversity studies to ecosystem functioning, modeling approaches including GIS and resource management, with special emphasis on the link between marine and freshwater environments. The editors expressly welcome research on baseline data. The knowledge-driven papers will interest researchers, while the problem-driven articles will be of particular interest to policy makers. The overarching aim of the journal is to translate science into policy, allowing us to understand global systems yet act on a regional scale. International Review of Hydrobiology publishes original articles, reviews, short communications, and methods papers.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Research on aquatic ecosystems – freshwater and marine environments and their management Land Use Effects on Water Chemistry in Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria (West Africa) Issue Information Research on aquatic ecosystems – freshwater and marine environments and their management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1