Exploring study skills among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Ashraf Kamel, Fathy A. Behery, G. Kenawy, Tarek El Ghamrawy, Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Nasr, M. Shaheen, R. Shatat, Mohammed Baag
{"title":"Exploring study skills among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Ashraf Kamel, Fathy A. Behery, G. Kenawy, Tarek El Ghamrawy, Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Nasr, M. Shaheen, R. Shatat, Mohammed Baag","doi":"10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_87_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Study skills are vital for academic performance. This study aims to explore the study skills of the students in Riyadh Elm University (REU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and to identify possible correlations of students' study skills with gender, academic level, and/or study field. Materials and Methods: A total of 816 students participated in this study from April 25, 2015 to May 25, 2015. A modified study skills assessment questionnaire of Counseling Centre of Houston University was used in this study. The questionnaire consisted of 32 items distributed in eight domains. The students' responses were recorded on a 4-point Likert scale and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and independent t-test. Results: The obtained responses were 816. The mean score of REU students' total study skills indicated moderate study skills. Good study skills were scored by 213 students (26.10%); moderate study skills by 574 students (70.34%); and poor study skills by 29 students (3.55%). Little variation in the mean study skills because of gender, study field or academic level was found. The highest scores were in domains II and IV (concentration/memory and test strategies/test anxiety) while the least scores were in domains and VII (reading and writing). Statistically significant differences were observed between male and female students in domain VI (motivation/attitude), between dental and nondental students in domains II and V (concentration/memory and organizing/processing information) and between junior and senior students in domains I, III, II, and VI (time management, concentration/memory, study aids/note taking, and motivation/attitude). Conclusion: The majority of REU students employed study skills at a moderate level. It is recommended to design and incorporate study skills educational courses for students in academic curricula.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"90 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_87_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Study skills are vital for academic performance. This study aims to explore the study skills of the students in Riyadh Elm University (REU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and to identify possible correlations of students' study skills with gender, academic level, and/or study field. Materials and Methods: A total of 816 students participated in this study from April 25, 2015 to May 25, 2015. A modified study skills assessment questionnaire of Counseling Centre of Houston University was used in this study. The questionnaire consisted of 32 items distributed in eight domains. The students' responses were recorded on a 4-point Likert scale and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and independent t-test. Results: The obtained responses were 816. The mean score of REU students' total study skills indicated moderate study skills. Good study skills were scored by 213 students (26.10%); moderate study skills by 574 students (70.34%); and poor study skills by 29 students (3.55%). Little variation in the mean study skills because of gender, study field or academic level was found. The highest scores were in domains II and IV (concentration/memory and test strategies/test anxiety) while the least scores were in domains and VII (reading and writing). Statistically significant differences were observed between male and female students in domain VI (motivation/attitude), between dental and nondental students in domains II and V (concentration/memory and organizing/processing information) and between junior and senior students in domains I, III, II, and VI (time management, concentration/memory, study aids/note taking, and motivation/attitude). Conclusion: The majority of REU students employed study skills at a moderate level. It is recommended to design and incorporate study skills educational courses for students in academic curricula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索沙特阿拉伯利雅得大学生的学习技巧
学习技能对学习成绩至关重要。本研究旨在探讨沙特阿拉伯利雅得Elm大学(REU)学生的学习技能,并确定学生的学习技能与性别、学术水平和/或学习领域的可能相关性。材料与方法:2015年4月25日至2015年5月25日,共有816名学生参与了本研究。本研究采用休斯顿大学心理咨询中心改良的学习技能评估问卷。问卷共32项,分布在8个领域。采用4点李克特量表记录学生的回答,采用描述性统计和独立t检验对数据进行分析。结果:共获得816份问卷。REU学生总学习技能平均得分为中等学习技能。213人(26.10%)认为学习能力好;学习能力一般的574人(70.34%);学习能力差的29名(3.55%)。研究发现,性别、研究领域或学术水平对平均学习技能的影响不大。得分最高的是领域II和IV(集中/记忆和测试策略/测试焦虑),而得分最低的是领域VII(阅读和写作)。男女学生在第六领域(动机/态度)、牙科学生和非牙科学生在第二和第五领域(集中/记忆和组织/处理信息)以及初中生和高中生在第一、第三、第二和第六领域(时间管理、集中/记忆、学习辅助/笔记和动机/态度)上存在统计学显著差异。结论:大多数REU学生的学习技能处于中等水平。建议在学术课程中为学生设计并纳入学习技巧教育课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of alveolar bone level after orthodontic clear aligners treatment: A retrospective study Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding artificial intelligence in histopathology: A cross-sectional study among oral pathologists in India Cross-sectional survey of resin-modified glass ionomer as dental restoration in Saudi Arabia Mandibular actinomyces osteomyelitis A comparative clinical evaluation of plaque removal efficacy of a chewable toothpaste tablet with conventional toothpaste in children – A randomized clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1