Assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of the Langenskiöld classification in Blount’s disease

J. du Plessis, G. Firth, A. Robertson
{"title":"Assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of the Langenskiöld classification in Blount’s disease","authors":"J. du Plessis, G. Firth, A. Robertson","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Langenskiöld classification is the most commonly utilized classification system for the radiological features of Blount’s disease. Although there is only a single study found on the interobserver variability and none found on the intraobserver variability, it is commonly used for prognostication and guiding management decisions. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of the Langenskiöld classification. A retrospective review of radiographs was done of patients treated for infantile and juvenile Blount’s disease at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital from 2006 to 2016. There were 70 radiographs of acceptable quality, which were reviewed and staged on two occasions according to the Langenskiöld classification by three orthopaedic consultants and three orthopaedic surgery senior residents. Pearson correlation coefficients, percentage agreements, and κ statistics were used to evaluate both the reliability and reproducibility. Of the 70 images staged, only two (2.9%) were staged the same by all six observers, and 20 (28.6%) images differed by a single stage. The consultants had 17 (24.3%) images staged the same whereas the residents had 12 (17.1%) images staged the same. The overall κ for all six observers showed a fair agreement of 0.24. Again, the consultants had a higher κ-value compared to residents of 0.25 and 0.24, respectively. The reproducibility amongst all observers was fair with a κ-value of 0.38. The consultants had a higher mean score of 0.48 compared to 0.26 for the residents. There was only a fair overall reliability and reproducibility amongst the six observers. We recommend the Langenskiöld classification be used with caution when being used for prognostication and management planning as well as when interpreting any research relying on this classification. Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.","PeriodicalId":16709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","volume":"75 1","pages":"311 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The Langenskiöld classification is the most commonly utilized classification system for the radiological features of Blount’s disease. Although there is only a single study found on the interobserver variability and none found on the intraobserver variability, it is commonly used for prognostication and guiding management decisions. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of the Langenskiöld classification. A retrospective review of radiographs was done of patients treated for infantile and juvenile Blount’s disease at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital from 2006 to 2016. There were 70 radiographs of acceptable quality, which were reviewed and staged on two occasions according to the Langenskiöld classification by three orthopaedic consultants and three orthopaedic surgery senior residents. Pearson correlation coefficients, percentage agreements, and κ statistics were used to evaluate both the reliability and reproducibility. Of the 70 images staged, only two (2.9%) were staged the same by all six observers, and 20 (28.6%) images differed by a single stage. The consultants had 17 (24.3%) images staged the same whereas the residents had 12 (17.1%) images staged the same. The overall κ for all six observers showed a fair agreement of 0.24. Again, the consultants had a higher κ-value compared to residents of 0.25 and 0.24, respectively. The reproducibility amongst all observers was fair with a κ-value of 0.38. The consultants had a higher mean score of 0.48 compared to 0.26 for the residents. There was only a fair overall reliability and reproducibility amongst the six observers. We recommend the Langenskiöld classification be used with caution when being used for prognostication and management planning as well as when interpreting any research relying on this classification. Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布朗特病Langenskiöld分类的可靠性和可重复性评估
Langenskiöld分类是布朗特病放射学特征最常用的分类系统。尽管只有一项研究发现了观察者之间的可变性,而没有发现观察者内部的可变性,但它通常用于预测和指导管理决策。本研究的目的是确定Langenskiöld分类的可靠性和可重复性。回顾性分析了2006年至2016年Chris Hani Baragwanath学术医院收治的婴幼儿布朗特病患者的x线片。70张质量可接受的x线片,由3名骨科顾问和3名骨科高级住院医师根据Langenskiöld分级进行两次评审和分级。使用Pearson相关系数、一致性百分比和κ统计来评估可靠性和再现性。在展示的70张图片中,只有两张(2.9%)是由所有6名观察者展示的,而20张(28.6%)是在一个单独的阶段中不同的。顾问有17张(24.3%)相同的图像,而居民有12张(17.1%)相同的图像。所有6个观察者的总体κ值均为0.24。同样,与居民相比,咨询师的κ值更高,分别为0.25和0.24。所有观察者的重现性都很好,κ值为0.38。咨询师的平均得分为0.48,高于住院医生的0.26。6名观察员的总体可靠性和可重复性尚可。我们建议在用于预测和管理计划以及解释依赖于此分类的任何研究时谨慎使用Langenskiöld分类。证据等级:III级,诊断性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lateral column lengthening’ by Torrez et al. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography, and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures Letter to the editor, concerning Cimen et al.: ‘Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia’ Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1