A Randomized, Open label, Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cystone Forte Tablet in Urolithiasis

Rajeev Chaudhari, P. Shah, Archana Shetty
{"title":"A Randomized, Open label, Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cystone Forte Tablet in Urolithiasis","authors":"Rajeev Chaudhari, P. Shah, Archana Shetty","doi":"10.35248/2168-9857.20.9.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cystone forte tablet in urolithiasis. A randomized, open-label, comparative clinical study was conducted in sixty-two subjects presenting with urolithiasis as diagnosed clinically with calculi measuring 5 to 12mm in size and subjects aged between 18-50 years of either sex. Sixty-two subjects were randomized into trial group and comparator group. Trial group subjects received Cystone forte tablet in the dose of 2 tablets twice daily for a period of 6 weeks while the comparator group received Tamsulosin tablet in the dose of 1 tablet once daily for a period of 6 weeks. The trial group subjects treated with Cystone forte tablets showed comparable results with the improvement of clinical parameters in urolithiasis and with the expulsion of kidney stones as compared to Tamsulosin group. The trial group receiving Cystone forte tablet was found to be effective and was beneficial in the management of urolithiasis. At the end of the study, mild occasional adverse events were reported in both the groups which were resolved. This clinical study demonstrates that, oral administration of Cystone forte tablets at the recommended dose is safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of urolithiasis.","PeriodicalId":89536,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2168-9857.20.9.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cystone forte tablet in urolithiasis. A randomized, open-label, comparative clinical study was conducted in sixty-two subjects presenting with urolithiasis as diagnosed clinically with calculi measuring 5 to 12mm in size and subjects aged between 18-50 years of either sex. Sixty-two subjects were randomized into trial group and comparator group. Trial group subjects received Cystone forte tablet in the dose of 2 tablets twice daily for a period of 6 weeks while the comparator group received Tamsulosin tablet in the dose of 1 tablet once daily for a period of 6 weeks. The trial group subjects treated with Cystone forte tablets showed comparable results with the improvement of clinical parameters in urolithiasis and with the expulsion of kidney stones as compared to Tamsulosin group. The trial group receiving Cystone forte tablet was found to be effective and was beneficial in the management of urolithiasis. At the end of the study, mild occasional adverse events were reported in both the groups which were resolved. This clinical study demonstrates that, oral administration of Cystone forte tablets at the recommended dose is safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of urolithiasis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机、开放标签、比较临床研究:评价复方膀胱石片治疗尿石症的疗效和安全性
本研究的目的是评价盐酸赛石酮片治疗尿石症的疗效和安全性。一项随机、开放标签、比较临床研究对62名临床诊断为尿石症且结石尺寸为5 - 12mm的患者进行了研究,受试者年龄在18-50岁之间,男女不限。将62例受试者随机分为试验组和比较组。试验组患者给予盐酸赛通片,剂量为2片,每日2次,连续6周;对照组患者给予坦索罗辛片,剂量为1片,每日1次,连续6周。与坦索罗辛组相比,试验组接受强赛石片治疗的受试者在尿石症的临床参数改善和肾结石排出方面显示出相当的结果。试验组服用复方赛石片治疗尿石症疗效显著。在研究结束时,两组都报告了轻微的偶尔不良事件,这些事件都得到了解决。本临床研究表明,按推荐剂量口服强赛石片对缓解尿石症症状是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Introduction to Pelvic Surgery The Condition: Pneumaturia Laparoscopy and Its Procedure Struvite and Triple Phosphate Renal Calculi Cancer in Prostate Gland and Prostatitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1