Efficacy and safety of 'dropless vitrectomy surgery' and comparison of outcomes to standard of care topical therapy.

Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-07-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2023.1215968
K V Chalam, Harris Ahmed
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of 'dropless vitrectomy surgery' and comparison of outcomes to standard of care topical therapy.","authors":"K V Chalam, Harris Ahmed","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2023.1215968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective/background: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide/moxifloxacin (Tri-Moxi) with the standard eye drop regimen for controlling postoperative inflammation, intraocular pressure, infections, macular thickness, and visual acuity (VA) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for various retinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Subject/methods: </strong>In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients who underwent vitrectomy using intravitreal Tri-Moxi at the end of surgery (Group 1) were compared with those who received standard topical steroid antibiotics (Group 2) in terms of intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure, macular thickness based on optical coherence tomography, and visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 consecutive eyes (group 1 [81 eyes]; group 2 [82 eyes]) were included. VA improved by two lines in both groups at 90 days. In Group 1, preoperative VA (logMAR) was 0.92 (0.66) compared to 0.92 (0.75) in Group 2 (p = 1), while at 3 months, it was 0.61 (0.3) and 0.57 (0.3), respectively (p = 0.46). Group 1 showed superior outcomes concerning central foveal thickness. The average central foveal thickness CFT (µm) in group 2 preoperatively was 423 (95) and 348 (63) at 3 months compared to group 1 526 (109) and 306 (108) preoperatively and 3 months, respectively (p = 0.042). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of elevated intraocular pressure between the two groups or anterior chamber cell reaction severity, and no cases of endophthalmitis were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tri-Moxi is effective after vitrectomy and is not inferior to standard postoperative topical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1215968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide/moxifloxacin (Tri-Moxi) with the standard eye drop regimen for controlling postoperative inflammation, intraocular pressure, infections, macular thickness, and visual acuity (VA) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for various retinal disorders.

Subject/methods: In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients who underwent vitrectomy using intravitreal Tri-Moxi at the end of surgery (Group 1) were compared with those who received standard topical steroid antibiotics (Group 2) in terms of intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure, macular thickness based on optical coherence tomography, and visual acuity.

Results: In total, 162 consecutive eyes (group 1 [81 eyes]; group 2 [82 eyes]) were included. VA improved by two lines in both groups at 90 days. In Group 1, preoperative VA (logMAR) was 0.92 (0.66) compared to 0.92 (0.75) in Group 2 (p = 1), while at 3 months, it was 0.61 (0.3) and 0.57 (0.3), respectively (p = 0.46). Group 1 showed superior outcomes concerning central foveal thickness. The average central foveal thickness CFT (µm) in group 2 preoperatively was 423 (95) and 348 (63) at 3 months compared to group 1 526 (109) and 306 (108) preoperatively and 3 months, respectively (p = 0.042). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of elevated intraocular pressure between the two groups or anterior chamber cell reaction severity, and no cases of endophthalmitis were observed in either group.

Conclusions: Tri-Moxi is effective after vitrectomy and is not inferior to standard postoperative topical therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无滴眼液玻璃体切除手术 "的有效性和安全性,以及与标准局部疗法的结果比较。
目的/背景:比较玻璃体内注射曲安奈德/氧氟沙星(Tri-Moxi)与标准滴眼液方案在控制因各种视网膜疾病接受玻璃体旁切除术的患者术后炎症、眼压、感染、黄斑厚度和视力(VA)方面的有效性:在这项回顾性纵向研究中,将在手术结束时使用玻璃体内Tri-Moxi的玻璃体切除术患者(第1组)与接受标准局部类固醇抗生素治疗的患者(第2组)在眼内炎症、眼压、基于光学相干断层扫描的黄斑厚度和视力方面进行了比较:共纳入了 162 只连续眼(第 1 组[81 只眼];第 2 组[82 只眼])。90 天后,两组患者的视力均提高了两行。第一组的术前视力(logMAR)为 0.92 (0.66),第二组为 0.92 (0.75)(p = 1),3 个月后分别为 0.61 (0.3) 和 0.57 (0.3)(p = 0.46)。第 1 组在中心眼窝厚度方面的疗效更佳。第 2 组术前的平均中心眼窝厚度 CFT(微米)为 423(95),3 个月时为 348(63),而第 1 组术前和 3 个月时的平均中心眼窝厚度分别为 526(109)和 306(108)(p = 0.042)。两组患者的眼压升高率或前房细胞反应严重程度无统计学差异,两组患者均未观察到眼内炎病例:结论:Tri-Moxi 在玻璃体切割术后效果显著,并不比标准的术后局部疗法差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1