{"title":"Technological Catastrophe and the Robots of Nam June Paik","authors":"G. Barrett","doi":"10.1353/cul.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that the difference between human labor and its robotic simulation lies in the human capacity to refuse to labor. To make this argument, the article examines Nam June Paik's Robot K-456 (1964)—an electronic sculpture that both performed and refusedto perform experimental music—in light of cybernetic robots since the Second World War. In addition to these robots, Paik's work also relates to their precedents in eighteenth-century musical automata, which, as incipient posthumans, had challenged the boundary between humans and machines. Drawing theories of the posthuman together with the critique of political economy, the article concludes that Paik's robot ultimately affirms that the capacity for self-negation is uniquely human by failing at its own self-destruction.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":"164 1","pages":"56 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2023.0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article argues that the difference between human labor and its robotic simulation lies in the human capacity to refuse to labor. To make this argument, the article examines Nam June Paik's Robot K-456 (1964)—an electronic sculpture that both performed and refusedto perform experimental music—in light of cybernetic robots since the Second World War. In addition to these robots, Paik's work also relates to their precedents in eighteenth-century musical automata, which, as incipient posthumans, had challenged the boundary between humans and machines. Drawing theories of the posthuman together with the critique of political economy, the article concludes that Paik's robot ultimately affirms that the capacity for self-negation is uniquely human by failing at its own self-destruction.
摘要:本文认为人类劳动与其机器人模拟的区别在于人类拒绝劳动的能力。为了证明这一观点,本文根据二战以来的控制论机器人,研究了白南骏(Nam June Paik)的机器人K-456(1964)——一个既表演又拒绝表演实验音乐的电子雕塑。除了这些机器人,白南准的作品还涉及到18世纪音乐自动机的先例,这些音乐自动机作为早期的后人类,挑战了人类和机器之间的界限。文章将后人类理论与政治经济学批判结合在一起,总结道:“机器人的自我毁灭失败,最终证实了人类独有的自我否定能力。”
期刊介绍:
Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.