Intervenciones de aprendizaje cooperativo y resultados asociados en futuros docentes: una revision sistemática

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Revista De Psicodidactica Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psicod.2022.04.002
Javier Fernandez-Rio , Sergio Rivera-Pérez , Damián Iglesias
{"title":"Intervenciones de aprendizaje cooperativo y resultados asociados en futuros docentes: una revision sistemática","authors":"Javier Fernandez-Rio ,&nbsp;Sergio Rivera-Pérez ,&nbsp;Damián Iglesias","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2022.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of cooperative learning as a pedagogical framework in teacher-training colleges and universities has gained special relevance in the last decade. What do we know about the impact of cooperative learning-based interventions on future teachers so far? The purpose was to provide a contemporary picture on cooperative learning interventions in teacher education students conducting a systematic review. More specifically, this paper aimed to answer the following research questions: (1) What was the focus of studies investigating the benefits of cooperative learning in future teachers? (2) Which learning outcomes have been observed? (3) What were the main effects in student-teachers? Several electronic literature databases were involved in the process (Web of Science, EBSCO host, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, SciELO). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed intervention studies were assessed. Nineteen eligible articles, involving 1944 teacher education students, were included to evaluate, organize and produce a high-level synthesis of evidence of this methodological approach. A comprehensive literature review is presented on its effects and learning outcomes. Findings showed that this teaching strategy can be useful for teacher education students’ global development: content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, personal, inter-personal and transversal skills, and professional skills and competencies. Unfortunately, these improvements are not linear and they need time and high-structured experiences. Cooperative learning has been found a positive framework in teacher education programs worldwide to train future teachers. Formative implications and future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103422000144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of cooperative learning as a pedagogical framework in teacher-training colleges and universities has gained special relevance in the last decade. What do we know about the impact of cooperative learning-based interventions on future teachers so far? The purpose was to provide a contemporary picture on cooperative learning interventions in teacher education students conducting a systematic review. More specifically, this paper aimed to answer the following research questions: (1) What was the focus of studies investigating the benefits of cooperative learning in future teachers? (2) Which learning outcomes have been observed? (3) What were the main effects in student-teachers? Several electronic literature databases were involved in the process (Web of Science, EBSCO host, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, SciELO). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed intervention studies were assessed. Nineteen eligible articles, involving 1944 teacher education students, were included to evaluate, organize and produce a high-level synthesis of evidence of this methodological approach. A comprehensive literature review is presented on its effects and learning outcomes. Findings showed that this teaching strategy can be useful for teacher education students’ global development: content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, personal, inter-personal and transversal skills, and professional skills and competencies. Unfortunately, these improvements are not linear and they need time and high-structured experiences. Cooperative learning has been found a positive framework in teacher education programs worldwide to train future teachers. Formative implications and future research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来教师合作学习干预及相关结果:系统综述
在过去十年中,合作学习作为一种教学框架在师范学院和大学中得到了特殊的应用。到目前为止,我们对以合作学习为基础的干预对未来教师的影响了解多少?本研究的目的是对合作学习干预教师教育学生的现状进行系统回顾。更具体地说,本文旨在回答以下研究问题:(1)调查合作学习对未来教师的益处的研究重点是什么?(2)观察到哪些学习成果?(3)对师生关系的主要影响是什么?几个电子文献数据库参与了这个过程(Web of Science, EBSCO主机,Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, SciELO)。评估定量、定性或混合干预研究。纳入了19篇符合条件的文章,涉及1944名教师教育学生,以评价、组织和产生这种方法方法证据的高水平综合。对其效果和学习效果进行了全面的文献综述。研究结果表明,这种教学策略有助于教师教育学生的全面发展:内容知识、教学内容知识、个人技能、人际技能和横向技能,以及专业技能和能力。不幸的是,这些改进不是线性的,它们需要时间和高度结构化的经验。合作学习在世界各地的教师教育项目中被发现是培养未来教师的积极框架。讨论了形成意义和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
期刊最新文献
Predicción de la intención docente del profesorado en formación inicial a partir del clima de (des-)empoderamiento creado por el formador del profesorado: un análisis longitudinal basado en la teoría de la autodeterminación Los descansos activos como herramienta para mejorar la atención en el contexto educativo. Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis Observando lo inadvertido: la autoeficacia docente como mediador entre el contexto escolar y el agotamiento docente en regiones en desarrollo Eficacia de un programa de prevención multirriesgo en internet: Safety.net ¿La percepción de competencia y alfabetización motriz median la relación entre la competencia motriz y la práctica de actividad física?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1