Evaluation of patient specific quality assurance of gated field in field radiation therapy technique using two-dimensional detector array

D. Jaroš, G. Kolarević, A. Kostovski, M. Savanović, Dejan Ćazić, G. Marošević, Nataša Totorović, D. Mirjanić
{"title":"Evaluation of patient specific quality assurance of gated field in field radiation therapy technique using two-dimensional detector array","authors":"D. Jaroš, G. Kolarević, A. Kostovski, M. Savanović, Dejan Ćazić, G. Marošević, Nataša Totorović, D. Mirjanić","doi":"10.17532/jhsci.2020.886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gated tangential field-in-field (FIF) technique is used to lower the dose to organs at risk for breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). In this study, the authors investigated the accuracy of the delivered treatment plan with and without gating using a two-dimensional detector array for patient-specific verification purposes.Methods: In this study, a 6MV beams were used for the merged FIF RT (forward Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy). The respiration signals for gated FIF delivery were obtained from the one-dimensional moving phantom using the real-time position management (RPM) system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). RPM system used for four-dimensional computed tomography scanner light-speed, GE is based on an infrared camera to detect motion of external 6-point marker. The beams were delivered using a Clinac iX (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with the multileaf collimator Millennium 120. The MapCheck2 (SunNuclear, Florida) was used for the evaluation of treatment plans. MapCheck2 was validated through a comparison with measurements from a farmer-type ion chamber. Gated beams were delivered using a maximum dose rate with varying duty cycles and analyzed the MapCheck2 data to evaluate treatment plan delivery accuracy.Results: Results of the gamma passing rate for relative and absolute dose differences for all ungated and gated beams were between 95.1% and 100%.Conclusion: Gated FIF technique can deliver an accurate dose to a detector during gated breast cancer RT. There is no significance between gated and ungated patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA); one can use ungated PSQA for verification of treatment plan delivery","PeriodicalId":15873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science","volume":"33 1","pages":"109-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2020.886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gated tangential field-in-field (FIF) technique is used to lower the dose to organs at risk for breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). In this study, the authors investigated the accuracy of the delivered treatment plan with and without gating using a two-dimensional detector array for patient-specific verification purposes.Methods: In this study, a 6MV beams were used for the merged FIF RT (forward Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy). The respiration signals for gated FIF delivery were obtained from the one-dimensional moving phantom using the real-time position management (RPM) system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). RPM system used for four-dimensional computed tomography scanner light-speed, GE is based on an infrared camera to detect motion of external 6-point marker. The beams were delivered using a Clinac iX (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with the multileaf collimator Millennium 120. The MapCheck2 (SunNuclear, Florida) was used for the evaluation of treatment plans. MapCheck2 was validated through a comparison with measurements from a farmer-type ion chamber. Gated beams were delivered using a maximum dose rate with varying duty cycles and analyzed the MapCheck2 data to evaluate treatment plan delivery accuracy.Results: Results of the gamma passing rate for relative and absolute dose differences for all ungated and gated beams were between 95.1% and 100%.Conclusion: Gated FIF technique can deliver an accurate dose to a detector during gated breast cancer RT. There is no significance between gated and ungated patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA); one can use ungated PSQA for verification of treatment plan delivery
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二维探测器阵列门控场放射治疗技术患者特异性质量保证评价
门控切向场内场(FIF)技术用于降低乳腺癌放射治疗(RT)中对危险器官的剂量。在这项研究中,作者调查了提供治疗计划的准确性与不闸门使用二维探测器阵列为患者特定的验证目的。方法:采用6MV光束进行融合正向调强放疗(FIF RT)。使用实时位置管理(RPM)系统(Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA)从一维运动体获得门控FIF输送的呼吸信号。RPM系统用于四维计算机断层扫描仪的光速,GE是基于红外摄像机来检测外部6点标记的运动。光束使用Clinac iX (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA)和multi - leaf准直器Millennium 120传送。MapCheck2 (SunNuclear, Florida)用于评估治疗方案。MapCheck2通过与农民型离子室的测量结果进行比较来验证。门控光束以不同占空比的最大剂量率传递,并分析MapCheck2数据以评估治疗计划传递的准确性。结果:非门控和门控光束相对剂量差和绝对剂量差的γ通过率在95.1% ~ 100%之间。结论:门控FIF技术可以在门控乳腺癌rt中向检测器提供准确的剂量,门控与非门控患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)之间无显著差异;可以使用无门控的PSQA来验证治疗计划的实施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Science
Journal of Health Science 医学-毒理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Environmental Risks from Electronic Waste Dumping in the West African Region The effect of physical therapy in daily life and work activities for people with chronic cervical pain syndrome Vestibular bone thickness of the mandible in relation to the mandibular canal in a population from Bosnia and Herzegovina A comparison of erect weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing radiography of the cervical spine in non-trauma patients Subhepatic Appendicitis: A diagnostic conundrum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1