The Artemis Accords: The End of Multilateralism in the Management of Outer Space?

Q3 Social Sciences Astropolitics Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/14777622.2022.2144241
Athar ud din
{"title":"The Artemis Accords: The End of Multilateralism in the Management of Outer Space?","authors":"Athar ud din","doi":"10.1080/14777622.2022.2144241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Artemis Accords, an initiative by the United States, establishes guiding principles relating to the exploration and use of the Moon and other celestial bodies. By using the example of interpretational issues pertaining to property and possessory rights in outer space, this paper demonstrates that the Artemis Accords have effectively put in place an alternate framework relating to the law of outer space. The development does not bode well for the prospects of a multilateral approach towards addressing global issues, especially for a global commons like outer space. Further, important spacefaring states have expressed concerns regarding the Artemis Accords, which risk establishing a fragmented approach toward exploration and use of outer space.","PeriodicalId":35153,"journal":{"name":"Astropolitics","volume":"5 1","pages":"135 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astropolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2022.2144241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Artemis Accords, an initiative by the United States, establishes guiding principles relating to the exploration and use of the Moon and other celestial bodies. By using the example of interpretational issues pertaining to property and possessory rights in outer space, this paper demonstrates that the Artemis Accords have effectively put in place an alternate framework relating to the law of outer space. The development does not bode well for the prospects of a multilateral approach towards addressing global issues, especially for a global commons like outer space. Further, important spacefaring states have expressed concerns regarding the Artemis Accords, which risk establishing a fragmented approach toward exploration and use of outer space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《阿尔忒弥斯协定》:外空管理多边主义的终结?
由美国发起的《阿尔忒弥斯协定》确立了探索和利用月球和其他天体的指导原则。本文以与外层空间的财产和占有权有关的解释问题为例,表明《阿尔忒弥斯协定》有效地建立了一个与外层空间法有关的替代框架。这一事态发展对以多边方式解决全球问题,特别是像外层空间这样的全球公域的问题的前景来说不是一个好兆头。此外,重要的航天国家对《阿耳忒弥斯协定》表示关切,该协定有可能建立一种探索和利用外层空间的支离破碎的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Astropolitics
Astropolitics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics and Policy is a peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal is dedicated to policy relevant and interdisciplinary analysis of civil, commercial, military, and intelligence space activities. Committed to the highest editorial standards, Astropolitics is the international journal of choice for the academic, policy-maker and professional in the space community.
期刊最新文献
Space Policy Imperative: The Urgency for a New International Space Governance System Electric Propulsion in Space: Technology and Geopolitics The Dragon’s Reach: China’s Quest for Space Dominance Watch the Skies: How Science Fiction Viewing, Documentary Viewing, and News Use Predict Attitudes on US Space Initiatives Engaging North Korea in the Space Domain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1