Role of genomic factors beyond thymidylate synthase in the prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil

G. Peters, K. Smid, E. Meijer, C. V. van Groeningen, L. Leon
{"title":"Role of genomic factors beyond thymidylate synthase in the prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil","authors":"G. Peters, K. Smid, E. Meijer, C. V. van Groeningen, L. Leon","doi":"10.1080/15257770.2016.1218020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is still a major drug in combinations regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. 5FU or its oral prodrug capecitabine is usually combined with irinotecan/oxaliplatin and the novel agents bevacizumab/cetuximab. Although this improved the outcome, the overall prognosis in patients with metastasized disease is still relatively poor. Although the target for 5FU, thymidylate synthase was shown to have a predictive value, this could only predict response in a subset of patients. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of CRC, it is likely that other aberrations can affect therapeutic response. As an alternative, we investigated Copy number alterations using oligonucleotide-based high-throughput array-comparative-genomic-hybridization (aCGH) to obtain an unbiased screening of the whole genetic spectrum. Chromosomal aberrations have been identified in 85% of CRC patients and include genomic regions harboring copy number alterations in the DNA. These alterations may change the expression of many genes and might explain the differential response to therapy as shown in recent studies with several 5FU combinations. In order to clarify new predictive parameters for 5FU, we used aCGH in a historical cohort of patients, which received treatment with single agent 5FU, and an unsupervised clustering analysis showed a statistical (p < 0.05) difference between responding and nonresponding patients. We also find that several regions showed differences between responders/non-responders, such as losses in 12p12.3–12q15 and in 18p (where TS is located) in responding patients. Genome-wide analysis may provide an additional tool to discriminate between responders and nonresponders.","PeriodicalId":19306,"journal":{"name":"Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids","volume":"14 1","pages":"595 - 603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15257770.2016.1218020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is still a major drug in combinations regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. 5FU or its oral prodrug capecitabine is usually combined with irinotecan/oxaliplatin and the novel agents bevacizumab/cetuximab. Although this improved the outcome, the overall prognosis in patients with metastasized disease is still relatively poor. Although the target for 5FU, thymidylate synthase was shown to have a predictive value, this could only predict response in a subset of patients. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of CRC, it is likely that other aberrations can affect therapeutic response. As an alternative, we investigated Copy number alterations using oligonucleotide-based high-throughput array-comparative-genomic-hybridization (aCGH) to obtain an unbiased screening of the whole genetic spectrum. Chromosomal aberrations have been identified in 85% of CRC patients and include genomic regions harboring copy number alterations in the DNA. These alterations may change the expression of many genes and might explain the differential response to therapy as shown in recent studies with several 5FU combinations. In order to clarify new predictive parameters for 5FU, we used aCGH in a historical cohort of patients, which received treatment with single agent 5FU, and an unsupervised clustering analysis showed a statistical (p < 0.05) difference between responding and nonresponding patients. We also find that several regions showed differences between responders/non-responders, such as losses in 12p12.3–12q15 and in 18p (where TS is located) in responding patients. Genome-wide analysis may provide an additional tool to discriminate between responders and nonresponders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸苷酸合成酶以外的基因组因素在预测5-氟尿嘧啶反应中的作用
5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)仍然是结肠直肠癌(CRC)联合治疗方案中的主要药物,无论是辅助治疗还是姑息治疗。5FU或其口服前药卡培他滨通常与伊立替康/奥沙利铂和新型药物贝伐单抗/西妥昔单抗合用。虽然这改善了预后,但转移性疾病患者的总体预后仍然相对较差。尽管胸腺苷酸合酶的5FU靶标被证明具有预测价值,但这只能预测一部分患者的反应。考虑到结直肠癌的异质性和复杂性,其他异常可能会影响治疗反应。作为替代方案,我们使用基于寡核苷酸的高通量阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)来研究拷贝数改变,以获得整个遗传谱的无偏筛选。在85%的结直肠癌患者中发现了染色体畸变,包括DNA拷贝数改变的基因组区域。这些改变可能会改变许多基因的表达,并可能解释最近研究中几种5FU组合对治疗的不同反应。为了明确5FU的新预测参数,我们在接受单药5FU治疗的历史队列患者中使用aCGH,无监督聚类分析显示,有反应的患者与无反应的患者之间存在统计学差异(p < 0.05)。我们还发现,应答者和非应答者之间的几个区域存在差异,例如应答患者12p12.3-12q15和18p (TS所在的位置)的缺失。全基因组分析可以提供一个额外的工具来区分反应者和无反应者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nucleoside dimers analogs containing floxuridine and thymidine with unnatural linker groups: synthesis and cancer line studies. Part III Multispectroscopic studies on the interaction of a copper(ii) complex of ibuprofen drug with calf thymus DNA Substrate specificity of E. coli uridine phosphorylase. Further evidences of high-syn conformation of the substrate in uridine phosphorolysis Intermolecular interaction of nickel (ii) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonic acid tetrasodium salt with bovine serum albumin: A multi-technique study Synthesis, stereochemical characterization, and antimicrobial evaluation of a potentially nonnephrotoxic 3′-C-acethydrazide puromycin analog
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1