Implementing the Australian Curriculum for Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings: Teachers’ Professional Learning Experiences and Preferences

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education Pub Date : 2018-08-28 DOI:10.1017/jsi.2018.14
Julie M. McMillan, K. Carson, P. Walker, Anna G. Noble, J. Jarvis, K. Bissaker
{"title":"Implementing the Australian Curriculum for Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings: Teachers’ Professional Learning Experiences and Preferences","authors":"Julie M. McMillan, K. Carson, P. Walker, Anna G. Noble, J. Jarvis, K. Bissaker","doi":"10.1017/jsi.2018.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commentary on the introduction of the Australian Curriculum (AC) has reflected a tension for educators of students with disabilities (SWD) between in-principle support for a curriculum that is inclusive of all students and the challenge of translating a general framework into relevant, individualised learning experiences appropriate for all SWD. In this paper, we report on findings from the second part of a national online survey in which we explored the perceptions and practices of 151 educators of SWD in specialist settings (special schools, disability units co-located at mainstream schools, special classes within mainstream schools) in relation to the AC. Specifically, these findings relate to the professional learning (PL) experiences and perceived needs of educators of SWD related to the AC and their advice to policymakers about the AC for SWD. Consistent with previous research, participants expressed a preference for PL experiences delivered on site, facilitated by content experts over extended periods, with opportunities for demonstration and targeted feedback, and in the context of collegial learning communities. In addition, participants raised concerns about the extent to which the AC is fully inclusive of all SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":53789,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"127 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2018.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Commentary on the introduction of the Australian Curriculum (AC) has reflected a tension for educators of students with disabilities (SWD) between in-principle support for a curriculum that is inclusive of all students and the challenge of translating a general framework into relevant, individualised learning experiences appropriate for all SWD. In this paper, we report on findings from the second part of a national online survey in which we explored the perceptions and practices of 151 educators of SWD in specialist settings (special schools, disability units co-located at mainstream schools, special classes within mainstream schools) in relation to the AC. Specifically, these findings relate to the professional learning (PL) experiences and perceived needs of educators of SWD related to the AC and their advice to policymakers about the AC for SWD. Consistent with previous research, participants expressed a preference for PL experiences delivered on site, facilitated by content experts over extended periods, with opportunities for demonstration and targeted feedback, and in the context of collegial learning communities. In addition, participants raised concerns about the extent to which the AC is fully inclusive of all SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在特殊环境中实施澳大利亚残疾学生课程:教师的专业学习经验和偏好
对澳大利亚课程(AC)引入的评论反映了残疾学生教育者(SWD)在原则上支持包括所有学生的课程和将一般框架转化为适合所有残疾学生的相关个性化学习体验的挑战之间的紧张关系。在本文中,我们报告了一项全国性在线调查的第二部分的结果,在该调查中,我们探讨了151名在特殊环境(特殊学校、主流学校的残疾单位、主流学校的特殊班级)工作的社署教育工作者对交流的看法和做法。具体而言,这些调查结果涉及社署教育工作者的专业学习经验和他们认为与社署交流有关的需要,以及他们就社署交流向政策制定者提出的建议。与之前的研究一致,参与者表达了对现场交付的PL经验的偏好,由内容专家在较长时间内提供指导,有机会进行演示和有针对性的反馈,并且在大学学习社区的背景下。此外,与会者对谘询委员会是否完全涵盖所有社会福利机构表示关注。讨论了对政策、实践和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
‘That’s Not Something That’s Necessarily on the Radar’: Educators’ Perspectives on Dysgraphia The Case for Special Education Teacher Wellbeing: A Multidimensional Review of the Evidence and Future Directions Transition From Primary to Secondary School From the Perspectives of Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Concomitant Intellectual Giftedness A Preliminary Study Connecting School Improvement and MTSS With Student Outcomes JSI volume 47 issue 2 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1