On the graph theory of majority illusions

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL mAbs Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2304.02258
M. Los, Z. Christoff, D. Grossi
{"title":"On the graph theory of majority illusions","authors":"M. Los, Z. Christoff, D. Grossi","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.02258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of an opinion in one's direct circles is not necessarily a good indicator of its popularity in one's entire community. For instance, when confronted with a majority of opposing opinions in one's circles, one might get the impression that one belongs to a minority. From this perspective, network structure makes local information about global properties of the group potentially inaccurate. However, the way a social network is wired also determines what kind of information distortion can actually occur. In this paper, we discuss which classes of networks allow for a majority of agents to have the wrong impression about what the majority opinion is, that is, to be in a 'majority illusion'.","PeriodicalId":18206,"journal":{"name":"mAbs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mAbs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The popularity of an opinion in one's direct circles is not necessarily a good indicator of its popularity in one's entire community. For instance, when confronted with a majority of opposing opinions in one's circles, one might get the impression that one belongs to a minority. From this perspective, network structure makes local information about global properties of the group potentially inaccurate. However, the way a social network is wired also determines what kind of information distortion can actually occur. In this paper, we discuss which classes of networks allow for a majority of agents to have the wrong impression about what the majority opinion is, that is, to be in a 'majority illusion'.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论多数错觉的图论
一种观点在一个人的直接圈子里的受欢迎程度并不一定能很好地表明它在整个社区的受欢迎程度。例如,当一个人在自己的圈子里面对大多数反对意见时,他可能会觉得自己属于少数人。从这个角度来看,网络结构使得关于群体整体属性的局部信息可能不准确。然而,社交网络的连接方式也决定了什么样的信息扭曲会真正发生。在本文中,我们讨论了哪些类别的网络允许大多数代理对大多数意见有错误的印象,即处于“多数错觉”中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
mAbs
mAbs 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
11.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: mAbs is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to the art and science of antibody research and development. The journal has a strong scientific and medical focus, but also strives to serve a broader readership. The articles are thus of interest to scientists, clinical researchers, and physicians, as well as the wider mAb community, including our readers involved in technology transfer, legal issues, investment, strategic planning and the regulation of therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Residue-resolved insights into the stabilization of therapeutic proteins by excipients: A case study of two monoclonal antibodies with arginine and glutamate. Development of a novel, high-throughput imaged capillary isoelectric focusing-Western method to characterize charge heterogeneity of monoclonal antibody heavy and light chains. On the graph theory of majority illusions eIg-based bispecific T-cell engagers targeting EGFR: Format matters. Characterization of high-molecular weight by-products in the production of a trivalent bispecific 2+1 heterodimeric antibody.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1