The Association between Personality and Individual Differences and Stigma toward People with Mental Disorders

Andrew C. H. Szeto, T. O’Neill, K. Dobson
{"title":"The Association between Personality and Individual Differences and Stigma toward People with Mental Disorders","authors":"Andrew C. H. Szeto, T. O’Neill, K. Dobson","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2015.1089799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although research examining the stigma of mental disorders is burgeoning, there has been little research exploring the personality and individual differences that may be associated with mental disorders stigma. The current study examined the relation between stigma toward mental disorders and social-psychological individual difference variables (intergroup anxiety, empathic concern, perspective taking, and modern prejudice toward people with mental disorders). As well, the Big Five and Honesty-Humility personality traits were examined at factor- and facet-levels to replicate and extend previous research that has examined their relations with stigma. The social-psychological individual difference variables were significantly correlated with mental disorders stigma. More interestingly, regression models indicated that intergroup anxiety, empathic concern, and modern prejudice accounted for more variance in the prediction of stigma than Big Five factors and facets. Additionally, results indicate the utility of examining factor- and facet levels, rather than only the factor level. These results highlight the need to further examine individual characteristics and personality in stigma research. To conclude, the current findings are discussed in the context of interventions aimed at reducing the stigma of mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":"15 1","pages":"303 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2015.1089799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Although research examining the stigma of mental disorders is burgeoning, there has been little research exploring the personality and individual differences that may be associated with mental disorders stigma. The current study examined the relation between stigma toward mental disorders and social-psychological individual difference variables (intergroup anxiety, empathic concern, perspective taking, and modern prejudice toward people with mental disorders). As well, the Big Five and Honesty-Humility personality traits were examined at factor- and facet-levels to replicate and extend previous research that has examined their relations with stigma. The social-psychological individual difference variables were significantly correlated with mental disorders stigma. More interestingly, regression models indicated that intergroup anxiety, empathic concern, and modern prejudice accounted for more variance in the prediction of stigma than Big Five factors and facets. Additionally, results indicate the utility of examining factor- and facet levels, rather than only the factor level. These results highlight the need to further examine individual characteristics and personality in stigma research. To conclude, the current findings are discussed in the context of interventions aimed at reducing the stigma of mental disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格、个体差异和对精神障碍患者的耻辱感之间的关系
尽管对精神障碍耻辱感的研究正在蓬勃发展,但很少有研究探索可能与精神障碍耻辱感相关的人格和个体差异。本研究考察了精神障碍耻辱感与社会心理个体差异变量(群体间焦虑、共情关怀、视角获取和对精神障碍患者的现代偏见)之间的关系。此外,五大人格特征和诚实谦卑人格特征在因素和层面上进行了研究,以复制和扩展先前研究它们与耻辱的关系的研究。社会心理个体差异变量与精神障碍耻感显著相关。更有趣的是,回归模型表明,群体间焦虑、共情关注和现代偏见在预测病耻感方面比五大因素和方面的差异更大。此外,结果表明检查因子和facet水平的效用,而不仅仅是因素水平。这些结果强调了在病耻感研究中进一步研究个体特征和个性的必要性。总之,目前的研究结果是在旨在减少精神障碍耻辱的干预措施的背景下讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Test of Using Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training. Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time? Screening homeless Veterans for a voluntary money management skills training program A recovery-oriented peer provider (ROPP) work-role model and prototype measure A qualitative description of community service, business, and organization perspectives on mental illness and inclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1