Erasmus Country Ranking: Towards Quality Student Mobility

Sónia Rolland Sobral
{"title":"Erasmus Country Ranking: Towards Quality Student Mobility","authors":"Sónia Rolland Sobral","doi":"10.18178/ijlt.8.1.31-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erasmus is a European Commission program which has been a huge success: more and more higher education students decide to move to one of the 34 countries that belong to the program. This article begins by analysing the reasons behind why students take a semester at another university in another country, and what the motivations for their choices are. The literature review reveals that there are personal, destination and academic reasons. Students who decide to make Erasmus mobility do not know how to choose the higher education institution where they will do said mobility. This article aims to help these students by ranking Erasmus mobility countries following the reasons that are identified in the literature as the most important. To rank Erasmus mobility countries, we use two criteria: destination and academic. The destination was subdivided into 7 items: Adventure, Cultural and Heritage, Safe and Secure, Cost of Living, Geographic Localization, Weather, Language and Sustainable. The academic part was divided into 3 items: research, university quality and sustainable. For each of the items we use the strongest and most reliable indicators. We also compare our ranking with the real number of student mobility for each of the 34 countries.","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.8.1.31-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Erasmus is a European Commission program which has been a huge success: more and more higher education students decide to move to one of the 34 countries that belong to the program. This article begins by analysing the reasons behind why students take a semester at another university in another country, and what the motivations for their choices are. The literature review reveals that there are personal, destination and academic reasons. Students who decide to make Erasmus mobility do not know how to choose the higher education institution where they will do said mobility. This article aims to help these students by ranking Erasmus mobility countries following the reasons that are identified in the literature as the most important. To rank Erasmus mobility countries, we use two criteria: destination and academic. The destination was subdivided into 7 items: Adventure, Cultural and Heritage, Safe and Secure, Cost of Living, Geographic Localization, Weather, Language and Sustainable. The academic part was divided into 3 items: research, university quality and sustainable. For each of the items we use the strongest and most reliable indicators. We also compare our ranking with the real number of student mobility for each of the 34 countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉斯谟国家排名:迈向高质量的学生流动性
伊拉斯谟是欧盟委员会的一个项目,它取得了巨大的成功:越来越多的高等教育学生决定前往参与该项目的34个国家之一。本文首先分析了学生在另一个国家的另一所大学学习一个学期的原因,以及他们选择的动机是什么。文献综述表明,这其中有个人原因、目的地原因和学术原因。决定进行伊拉斯谟流动的学生不知道如何选择他们将进行流动的高等教育机构。本文旨在帮助这些学生通过排名伊拉斯谟流动国家以下的原因,在文献中确定为最重要的。为了对伊拉斯谟流动国家进行排名,我们使用了两个标准:目的地和学术水平。目的地被细分为7个项目:冒险、文化与遗产、安全与保障、生活成本、地理定位、天气、语言和可持续发展。学术部分分为研究、大学质量和可持续发展三个方面。对于每一个项目,我们都使用最强和最可靠的指标。我们还将我们的排名与34个国家的实际学生流动人数进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarity of read outline discussion evaluation models to improve students' communication skills Algerian dialect, a sine qua non to learning standard Arabic Perpetuating inclusive education amidst the affiliative leadership style: Challenges and potentials Comparing competitive team-based learning with other instructional methods and approaches Teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of the “No child left behind policy”: Basis for framework enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1