Implications of a possible TeV break in the cosmic-ray electron and positron flux

Yunhua Ding, Nan Li, Chun-Cheng Wei, Yue-Liang Wu, Yu-feng Zhou
{"title":"Implications of a possible TeV break in the cosmic-ray electron and positron flux","authors":"Yunhua Ding, Nan Li, Chun-Cheng Wei, Yue-Liang Wu, Yu-feng Zhou","doi":"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.115010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A TeV spectral break in the total flux of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons (CREs) at which the spectral power index softens from $\\sim 3$ to $\\sim 4$ has been observed by H.E.S.S. and recently confirmed by DAMPE with a high significance of $6.6~\\sigma$. Such an observation is apparently inconsistent with the data from other experiments such as Fermi-LAT, AMS-02 and CALET. We perform a global analysis to the latest CRE data including Fermi-LAT, AMS-02, CALET, DAMPE and H.E.S.S. with energy scale uncertainties taken into account to improve the consistency between the data sets. The fit result strongly favors the existence of the break at $\\sim 1$ TeV with an even higher statistical significance of $13.3~\\sigma$. In view of the tentative CRE break, we revisit a number of models of nearby sources, such as a single generic Pulsar Wind Nebula (PWN), known multiple PWNe from the ATNF catalog, and their combinations with either an additional Dark Matter (DM) component or a Supernova Remnant (SNR). We show that the CRE break at $\\sim 1$ TeV, together with the known CR positron excess points towards the possibility that the nearby sources should be highly charge asymmetric. Among the models under consideration, the one with a PWN plus SNR is most favored by the current data. The favoured distance and age of the PWN and SNR sources are both within $0.6$ kpc and around $10^{5}$ yr respectively. Possible candidate sources include PSR J0954-5430, Vela and Monogem ring, etc. We find that for the models under consideration, the additional DM component is either unnecessary, or predicts too much photons in tension with the H.E.S.S. data of $\\gamma$-rays from the direction of the Galactic Center. We also show that the current measurement of the anisotropies in the arrival direction of the CRE can be useful in determining the property of the sources.","PeriodicalId":8437,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.115010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A TeV spectral break in the total flux of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons (CREs) at which the spectral power index softens from $\sim 3$ to $\sim 4$ has been observed by H.E.S.S. and recently confirmed by DAMPE with a high significance of $6.6~\sigma$. Such an observation is apparently inconsistent with the data from other experiments such as Fermi-LAT, AMS-02 and CALET. We perform a global analysis to the latest CRE data including Fermi-LAT, AMS-02, CALET, DAMPE and H.E.S.S. with energy scale uncertainties taken into account to improve the consistency between the data sets. The fit result strongly favors the existence of the break at $\sim 1$ TeV with an even higher statistical significance of $13.3~\sigma$. In view of the tentative CRE break, we revisit a number of models of nearby sources, such as a single generic Pulsar Wind Nebula (PWN), known multiple PWNe from the ATNF catalog, and their combinations with either an additional Dark Matter (DM) component or a Supernova Remnant (SNR). We show that the CRE break at $\sim 1$ TeV, together with the known CR positron excess points towards the possibility that the nearby sources should be highly charge asymmetric. Among the models under consideration, the one with a PWN plus SNR is most favored by the current data. The favoured distance and age of the PWN and SNR sources are both within $0.6$ kpc and around $10^{5}$ yr respectively. Possible candidate sources include PSR J0954-5430, Vela and Monogem ring, etc. We find that for the models under consideration, the additional DM component is either unnecessary, or predicts too much photons in tension with the H.E.S.S. data of $\gamma$-rays from the direction of the Galactic Center. We also show that the current measurement of the anisotropies in the arrival direction of the CRE can be useful in determining the property of the sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宇宙射线电子和正电子通量中可能的TeV断裂的含义
宇宙射线电子和正电子(CREs)的总通量中有一个TeV的谱断,在这个谱断处,谱功率指数从$\sim 3$软化到$\sim 4$,这是由H.E.S.S.观测到的,最近由DAMPE证实,其显著性为$6.6~\sigma$。这样的观测结果显然与Fermi-LAT、AMS-02和CALET等其他实验的数据不一致。我们对Fermi-LAT、AMS-02、CALET、DAMPE和H.E.S.S.等最新的CRE数据进行了全局分析,考虑了能量尺度的不确定性,以提高数据集之间的一致性。拟合结果强烈支持在$\sim 1$ TeV处存在断裂,并且具有更高的统计显著性$13.3~\sigma$。鉴于CRE的暂定性破裂,我们重新审视了附近源的一些模型,例如单一的一般脉冲星风星云(PWN),已知的ATNF目录中的多个脉冲星风星云,以及它们与额外的暗物质(DM)成分或超新星遗迹(SNR)的组合。我们表明,在$\sim 1$ TeV处的CRE断裂,加上已知的CR正电子过剩,表明附近的源可能是高度电荷不对称的。在考虑的模型中,具有PWN +信噪比的模型最受当前数据的青睐。PWN源和信噪比源的有利距离和年龄分别在$0.6$ kpc和$10^{5}$ yr左右。可能的来源包括PSR J0954-5430、Vela和Monogem环等。我们发现,对于所考虑的模型,额外的DM分量要么是不必要的,要么是与银河系中心方向的$\gamma$射线的H.E.S.S.数据预测了太多的光子张力。我们还表明,在CRE到达方向上的各向异性的当前测量可以用于确定源的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilizing cosmic-ray positron and electron observations to probe the averaged properties of Milky Way pulsars EuCAPT White Paper: Opportunities and Challenges for Theoretical Astroparticle Physics in the Next Decade The galactic millisecond pulsar population : implications for the Galactic Center Excess. Spectral-temporal features of repeating ( one-off ) FRBs and Axion Star. AstroSat/UVIT observations of IC 4329A: constraining the accretion disc inner radius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1