Challenging times: building a health, housing and social care local workforce strategy

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0010
P. Dearnaley, Joanne Smith
{"title":"Challenging times: building a health, housing and social care local workforce strategy","authors":"P. Dearnaley, Joanne Smith","doi":"10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to stimulate a wider debate around the coordination of workforce planning in non-statutory services (in this case, specialist housing for older people or those with long-term health and social care needs, such as learning disabilities). The authors argue that current NHS reforms do not go far enough in that they fail to include specialist housing and its workforce in integration, and by doing so, will be unable to optimise the potential efficiencies and streamlining of service delivery to this group.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper used exploratory study using existing research and data, enhanced by documentary analysis from industry bodies, regulators and policy think tanks.\n\n\nFindings\nThat to achieve the greatest operational and fiscal impact upon the health care services, priority must be given to improving the efficiency and coordination of services to older people and those requiring nursing homes or registered care across the public and third sectors through the integration of service delivery and workforce planning.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWhilst generalisable and achievable, the model proposed within the paper cannot be fully tested theoretically and requires further testing the in real health and social care market to evidence its practicality, improved quality of care and financial benefits.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper highlights some potential limitations to the current NHS reforms: by integrating non-statutory services, planned efficiency savings may be optimised and service delivery improved.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"236 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to stimulate a wider debate around the coordination of workforce planning in non-statutory services (in this case, specialist housing for older people or those with long-term health and social care needs, such as learning disabilities). The authors argue that current NHS reforms do not go far enough in that they fail to include specialist housing and its workforce in integration, and by doing so, will be unable to optimise the potential efficiencies and streamlining of service delivery to this group. Design/methodology/approach The paper used exploratory study using existing research and data, enhanced by documentary analysis from industry bodies, regulators and policy think tanks. Findings That to achieve the greatest operational and fiscal impact upon the health care services, priority must be given to improving the efficiency and coordination of services to older people and those requiring nursing homes or registered care across the public and third sectors through the integration of service delivery and workforce planning. Research limitations/implications Whilst generalisable and achievable, the model proposed within the paper cannot be fully tested theoretically and requires further testing the in real health and social care market to evidence its practicality, improved quality of care and financial benefits. Originality/value The paper highlights some potential limitations to the current NHS reforms: by integrating non-statutory services, planned efficiency savings may be optimised and service delivery improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:本文的目的是激发围绕非法定服务(在这种情况下,为老年人或有长期健康和社会护理需求的人,如学习障碍的人提供专门住房)中劳动力规划的协调进行更广泛的辩论。作者认为,目前的NHS改革做得还不够,因为他们没有将专家住房及其劳动力纳入整合,这样做将无法优化潜在的效率和精简服务提供给这个群体。设计/方法/方法本文利用现有研究和数据进行探索性研究,并辅以行业机构、监管机构和政策智库的文献分析。调查结果:为了对保健服务产生最大的业务和财政影响,必须优先考虑通过整合服务提供和人力规划,提高公共部门和第三部门对老年人和需要养老院或注册护理的人的服务效率和协调。研究限制/影响虽然具有普遍性和可实现性,但本文中提出的模型不能在理论上进行充分测试,需要进一步测试真实的健康和社会护理市场,以证明其实用性,提高护理质量和经济效益。本文强调了当前NHS改革的一些潜在限制:通过整合非法定服务,计划的效率节约可能得到优化,服务提供得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1