How different national strategies of implementing digital technology can affect teacher educators

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy Pub Date : 2019-04-10 DOI:10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-04-02
Siri Sollied Madsen, S. Archard, Steinar Thorvaldsen
{"title":"How different national strategies of implementing digital technology can affect teacher educators","authors":"Siri Sollied Madsen, S. Archard, Steinar Thorvaldsen","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-04-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over ten years have passed since Norwegian educational reform implemented the use of digital tools as a required basic skill in all subjects and at all levels of Norwegian schools. However, government surveys show that there is still a significant gap between the intention of educational policies and what is actually practiced in Norwegian education. This gap has often been attributed to practitioners’ skill deficiency. This paper challenges the notion of practitioners’ skill deficiency as being the sole causal explanation for lack of progress, and attempts to explore this through a comparative study between initial teacher education in Norway and New Zealand. Our analysis has shown some significant differences between the countries, and based on our findings, this article discusses how such differences may be connected to policy development and political influence. This analysis contributes to a broader understanding of the complexity behind this gap. Understanding the bigger picture is essential for being able to work constructively towards diminishing the difference between policy intentions and practice in the future. Our findings suggest that top-down governance of the educational use of digital technology could create resistance among teacher educators. It could therefore be understood as counterproductive regarding progress. Prioritising policy goals above pedagogical goals in this field is contrary to teachers’ understanding of teacher proficiency.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-04-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Over ten years have passed since Norwegian educational reform implemented the use of digital tools as a required basic skill in all subjects and at all levels of Norwegian schools. However, government surveys show that there is still a significant gap between the intention of educational policies and what is actually practiced in Norwegian education. This gap has often been attributed to practitioners’ skill deficiency. This paper challenges the notion of practitioners’ skill deficiency as being the sole causal explanation for lack of progress, and attempts to explore this through a comparative study between initial teacher education in Norway and New Zealand. Our analysis has shown some significant differences between the countries, and based on our findings, this article discusses how such differences may be connected to policy development and political influence. This analysis contributes to a broader understanding of the complexity behind this gap. Understanding the bigger picture is essential for being able to work constructively towards diminishing the difference between policy intentions and practice in the future. Our findings suggest that top-down governance of the educational use of digital technology could create resistance among teacher educators. It could therefore be understood as counterproductive regarding progress. Prioritising policy goals above pedagogical goals in this field is contrary to teachers’ understanding of teacher proficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施数字技术的不同国家战略如何影响教师教育
自挪威教育改革实施将数字工具作为挪威各级学校所有学科的必备基本技能以来,已经过去了十多年。然而,政府调查显示,教育政策的意图与挪威教育的实际情况之间仍然存在着巨大的差距。这种差距通常被归因于从业者的技能不足。本文挑战了从业者技能不足是缺乏进步的唯一因果解释的概念,并试图通过对挪威和新西兰初级教师教育的比较研究来探讨这一点。我们的分析显示了国家之间的一些显著差异,根据我们的发现,本文讨论了这些差异如何与政策制定和政治影响联系起来。这种分析有助于更广泛地理解这一差距背后的复杂性。了解大局对于能够建设性地缩小未来政策意图与实践之间的差异至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,对数字技术的教育使用进行自上而下的管理可能会在教师教育工作者中产生阻力。因此,它可以被理解为对进步起反作用。在这一领域,将政策目标置于教学目标之上与教师对教师熟练程度的理解背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Are Norwegian Education Authorities Digitising Education? Digital nødundervisning under covid-19-nedstengning Physiotherapy Students’ Shaping of Digital Learning Practices: Characteristics, Opportunities and Challenges Reading in the digital age Læringsanalyse – tilbakeblikk og frampek
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1