Depth Sensitivity of Apparent Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements using Multi-coil and Multi-frequency Electromagnetic Induction

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.32389/JEEG20-001
Kamaleswaran Sadatcharam, D. Altdorff, Adrian Unc, M. Krishnapillai, L. Galagedara
{"title":"Depth Sensitivity of Apparent Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements using Multi-coil and Multi-frequency Electromagnetic Induction","authors":"Kamaleswaran Sadatcharam, D. Altdorff, Adrian Unc, M. Krishnapillai, L. Galagedara","doi":"10.32389/JEEG20-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apparent magnetic susceptibility (MSa) as recorded by electromagnetic induction (EMI) instruments could offer relevant information about non-soil subsurface features. It is less affected by natural soil properties than its prominent counterpart, i.e., apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). Hence, MSa is generally a promising approach to investigate artificial inclusions and structures in soil. However, while the origin depth of EMI based ECa is widely accepted, the depth sensitivity (DS) of MSa measurements remains poorly understood. The depth interpretation of MSa is particularly challenging due to negative values especially for objects that are randomly distributed over different depths. Here we assessed the performance of both multi-coil (MC) and multi-frequency (MF) EMI sensors for identifying and determining the DS of MSa measurements in shallow soils through detection of buried small targets of known conductivity. Two experiments were conducted in a sandy loam podzolic soil in western Newfoundland, Canada. Materials of different conductivities, including metal and plastic targets, were buried at depths between 20 and 80 cm. Three inter-coil separations (32, 71 and 118 cm) of the MC sensor and four factory-calibrated frequencies (18, 38, 49 and 80 kHz) of the MF sensor were tested in both horizontal and vertical coil orientations. The MC sensor clearly detected all four metal targets from three coil separations in both coil orientations while the MF sensor identified more anomalies than targets limiting its information value. Based on the measurements from MC and the theoretical DS function, a criterion was developed and validated to assess the potential depth origin of MSa. We found that negative or less than the background values occur, if the depth of the target is shallower than 0.36 times the coil distance of the employed EMI sensor. According to this criterion, the depth origins of metallic targets were correctly identified under the assumption of low induction numbers, even if values were negative.","PeriodicalId":15748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","volume":"23 1","pages":"301-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32389/JEEG20-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Apparent magnetic susceptibility (MSa) as recorded by electromagnetic induction (EMI) instruments could offer relevant information about non-soil subsurface features. It is less affected by natural soil properties than its prominent counterpart, i.e., apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). Hence, MSa is generally a promising approach to investigate artificial inclusions and structures in soil. However, while the origin depth of EMI based ECa is widely accepted, the depth sensitivity (DS) of MSa measurements remains poorly understood. The depth interpretation of MSa is particularly challenging due to negative values especially for objects that are randomly distributed over different depths. Here we assessed the performance of both multi-coil (MC) and multi-frequency (MF) EMI sensors for identifying and determining the DS of MSa measurements in shallow soils through detection of buried small targets of known conductivity. Two experiments were conducted in a sandy loam podzolic soil in western Newfoundland, Canada. Materials of different conductivities, including metal and plastic targets, were buried at depths between 20 and 80 cm. Three inter-coil separations (32, 71 and 118 cm) of the MC sensor and four factory-calibrated frequencies (18, 38, 49 and 80 kHz) of the MF sensor were tested in both horizontal and vertical coil orientations. The MC sensor clearly detected all four metal targets from three coil separations in both coil orientations while the MF sensor identified more anomalies than targets limiting its information value. Based on the measurements from MC and the theoretical DS function, a criterion was developed and validated to assess the potential depth origin of MSa. We found that negative or less than the background values occur, if the depth of the target is shallower than 0.36 times the coil distance of the employed EMI sensor. According to this criterion, the depth origins of metallic targets were correctly identified under the assumption of low induction numbers, even if values were negative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多线圈多频电磁感应测量视磁化率的深度灵敏度
电磁感应(EMI)仪器记录的表观磁化率(MSa)可以提供非土壤地下特征的相关信息。它受自然土壤性质的影响比其突出的对应物,即视电导率(ECa)要小。因此,MSa通常是研究土壤中人工包裹体和结构的一种很有前途的方法。然而,尽管基于EMI的ECa的起源深度被广泛接受,但对MSa测量的深度灵敏度(DS)仍然知之甚少。由于负值,特别是对于随机分布在不同深度的对象,MSa的深度解释特别具有挑战性。在这里,我们评估了多线圈(MC)和多频率(MF) EMI传感器的性能,通过检测已知电导率的埋藏小目标来识别和确定浅层土壤中MSa测量的DS。在加拿大纽芬兰西部的沙质壤土灰化土中进行了两项试验。不同电导率的材料,包括金属和塑料靶,被埋在20到80厘米的深度之间。在水平和垂直线圈方向上测试了MC传感器的三个线圈间距(32、71和118 cm)和MF传感器的四个工厂校准频率(18、38、49和80 kHz)。MC传感器从两个线圈方向的三个线圈分离中清楚地检测到所有四个金属目标,而MF传感器识别的异常比目标更多,限制了其信息价值。基于MC测量结果和理论DS函数,建立并验证了MSa潜在深度成因的判别标准。我们发现,如果目标的深度小于所采用EMI传感器线圈距离的0.36倍,则会出现负或小于背景值。根据该准则,在低感应数假设下,即使感应数为负,也能正确识别金属目标的深度源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The JEEG (ISSN 1083-1363) is the peer-reviewed journal of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society (EEGS). JEEG welcomes manuscripts on new developments in near-surface geophysics applied to environmental, engineering, and mining issues, as well as novel near-surface geophysics case histories and descriptions of new hardware aimed at the near-surface geophysics community.
期刊最新文献
Applications and Analytical Methods of Ground Penetrating Radar for Soil Characterization in a Silvopastoral System Introduction to the Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Special Issue on the Application of Proximal and Remote Sensing Technologies to Soil Investigations Integrated Agrogeophysical Approach for Investigating Soil Pipes in Agricultural Fields Automated Segmentation Framework for Asphalt Layer Thickness from GPR Data Using a Cascaded k-Means - DBSCAN Algorithm Continuous Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Water Content Profile During Infiltration Using Sparse Multi-Offset GPR Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1