Exploitation and effective altruism

IF 1.6 2区哲学 Q2 ETHICS Politics Philosophy & Economics Pub Date : 2021-02-19 DOI:10.1177/1470594X21994495

Daniel Muñoz

引用次数: 0

Abstract

How could it be wrong to exploit – say, by paying sweatshop wages – if the exploited party benefits? How could it be wrong to do something gratuitously bad – like giving to a wasteful charity – if that is better than permissibly doing nothing? Joe Horton argues that these puzzles, known as the Exploitation Problem and All or Nothing Problem, have no unified answer. I propose one and pose a challenge for Horton’s take on the Exploitation Problem.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

剥削和有效利他主义

如果被剥削方从中受益，那么剥削——比如支付血汗工厂的工资——怎么可能是错的呢?如果做一些无缘无故的坏事——比如给一个浪费的慈善机构捐款——比什么都不做要好，那怎么可能是错的呢?乔·霍顿(Joe Horton)认为，这些被称为“剥削问题”和“全有或全无问题”的谜题没有统一的答案。我提出了一个问题，并对霍顿关于剥削问题的观点提出了挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Politics Philosophy & Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politics, Philosophy & Economics aims to bring moral, economic and political theory to bear on the analysis, justification and criticism of political and economic institutions and public policies. The Editors are committed to publishing peer-reviewed papers of high quality using various methodologies from a wide variety of normative perspectives. They seek to provide a distinctive forum for discussions and debates among political scientists, philosophers, and economists on such matters as constitutional design, property rights, distributive justice, the welfare state, egalitarianism, the morals of the market, democratic socialism, population ethics, and the evolution of norms.

期刊最新文献

A Farewell Editorial Democratic speech in divided times: An introduction How to talk back: hate speech, misinformation, and the limits of salience Discursive optimism defended Lockdowns and the ethics of intergenerational compensation