Uso de máscaras de buceo modificadas para aplicación segura de ventilación no invasiva Estudio piloto

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista Medica del Uruguay Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.29193/rmu.37.4.1
Rodrigo Beltramelli, Pedro Alzugaray, Nicolás Rucks, C. Santos, Carolina Poradosu, G. González, Ana Musetti, Martín Angulo
{"title":"Uso de máscaras de buceo modificadas para aplicación segura de ventilación no invasiva Estudio piloto","authors":"Rodrigo Beltramelli, Pedro Alzugaray, Nicolás Rucks, C. Santos, Carolina Poradosu, G. González, Ana Musetti, Martín Angulo","doi":"10.29193/rmu.37.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: within the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, different authors proposed adaptations to snorkeling masks available in the market (modified masks: MM) to provide oxygen therapy with positive pressure ventilation or not. Until today, none of them has assessed its performance as an interface for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the inspiratory pressure support mode. Objective: to develop an interface of NIV using MM and assess its performance with a conventional full mask. Method: the MM were adapted as NIV interfaces using two pieces created by 3D printing. Their performance was compared to a that of a conventional mask in 10 healthy volunteers in inspiratory pressure support (3 cmH2O) mode with two levels of positive pressure towards the end of expiration (PEEP 4 and 8 cmH2O). The following were compared: system leaks, respiratory rate, normal volume, pulse oximetry, transcutaneous carbon dioxide and comfort. Results: with 4 cmH2O of PEEP, no significant differences were found between masks in none of the variables studied. With 8 cmH2O de PEEP, the use of MM were associated to a lower level of CO2tc (41.0±5.7 vs 43.5±8.1 mmHg; p=0.03) and greater comfort (8.3±1.1 vs 6.5±1.4; p<0.01) than conventional masks (CM). Conclusions: in healthy volunteers, MM for NIV evidence a similar performance than that of standard oronasal masks, and have a further advantage, as they are more comfortable and cheaper. Even if further studies are needed to support its use, modified snorkeling masks could represent a valid option during the health emergency caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in consideration of the scarce interfaces available in the market.","PeriodicalId":51931,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.37.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: within the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, different authors proposed adaptations to snorkeling masks available in the market (modified masks: MM) to provide oxygen therapy with positive pressure ventilation or not. Until today, none of them has assessed its performance as an interface for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the inspiratory pressure support mode. Objective: to develop an interface of NIV using MM and assess its performance with a conventional full mask. Method: the MM were adapted as NIV interfaces using two pieces created by 3D printing. Their performance was compared to a that of a conventional mask in 10 healthy volunteers in inspiratory pressure support (3 cmH2O) mode with two levels of positive pressure towards the end of expiration (PEEP 4 and 8 cmH2O). The following were compared: system leaks, respiratory rate, normal volume, pulse oximetry, transcutaneous carbon dioxide and comfort. Results: with 4 cmH2O of PEEP, no significant differences were found between masks in none of the variables studied. With 8 cmH2O de PEEP, the use of MM were associated to a lower level of CO2tc (41.0±5.7 vs 43.5±8.1 mmHg; p=0.03) and greater comfort (8.3±1.1 vs 6.5±1.4; p<0.01) than conventional masks (CM). Conclusions: in healthy volunteers, MM for NIV evidence a similar performance than that of standard oronasal masks, and have a further advantage, as they are more comfortable and cheaper. Even if further studies are needed to support its use, modified snorkeling masks could represent a valid option during the health emergency caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in consideration of the scarce interfaces available in the market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用改良潜水面罩安全应用无创通风初步研究
导论:在SARS-CoV-2大流行的背景下,不同的作者提出了对市场上可用的浮潜面罩(改良面罩:MM)进行调整,以提供正压通气或不提供氧气治疗。直到今天,还没有人评估过它在吸气压力支持模式下作为无创通气(NIV)接口的性能。目的:研制一种基于MM的NIV接口,并与常规全掩膜比较其性能。方法:采用3D打印制作的两块MM作为NIV接口。将10名健康志愿者在吸气压力支持(3 cmH2O)模式下的表现与传统口罩进行比较,呼气结束时有两个正压水平(PEEP 4和8 cmH2O)。比较系统泄漏、呼吸频率、正常容积、脉搏血氧、经皮二氧化碳和舒适度。结果:当PEEP为4 cmH2O时,面罩之间在所有研究变量中均无显著差异。8 cmH2O de PEEP时,MM的使用与较低的CO2tc水平相关(41.0±5.7 vs 43.5±8.1 mmHg;P =0.03)和更高的舒适度(8.3±1.1 vs 6.5±1.4;p<0.01)。结论:在健康志愿者中,用于NIV的MM显示出与标准口鼻口罩相似的性能,并且具有进一步的优势,因为它们更舒适,更便宜。即使需要进一步的研究来支持其使用,但考虑到市场上可用的接口稀缺,在SARS-CoV-2大流行引起的卫生紧急情况下,改良的浮潜口罩可能是一个有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Medica del Uruguay
Revista Medica del Uruguay MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bioética en donantes en asistolia controlada Sistematización de los resultados de los primeros diez años del Tribunal de Ética Médica del Colegio Médico del Uruguay Síndrome de Burnout en residentes y posgrados de Neonatología en un centro hospitalario de tercer nivel Análisis situacional y seguimiento, período 2021 - 2023 Repercusión de la pandemia COVID-19 en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama en pacientes asistidas en la Unidad de Mastología del Hospital de Clínicas Resultados obstétricos y perinatales de la enfermedad materna por COVID-19 Estudio de casos y controles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1