Investigation of team composition and task-related conflict as determinants of engineering service productivity

P. Przybysz, S. Duckwitz, S. Mutze-Niewohner, C. Schlick
{"title":"Investigation of team composition and task-related conflict as determinants of engineering service productivity","authors":"P. Przybysz, S. Duckwitz, S. Mutze-Niewohner, C. Schlick","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the early phases of engineering service projects are essential for product success, methods and tools to proactively and comprehensively evaluate the productivity of complex service processes are rare. In this paper the effects of team composition in terms of age diversity and task-related conflict on the outcome of a R&D task are examined in a laboratory experiment. Age heterogeneous and age homogeneous project teams were build and the level of task-related conflict was measured by means of an established instrument as a qualitative team aspect. In the outcome dimension the number of ideas generated during a brainstorming represents the quantitative team performance. To obtain also a quality-oriented view of team performance, the final task results were evaluated by domain experts. This evaluation allows the analysis of the impact of one isolated influence factor on service productivity across the whole chain of value creation within a complex engineering service setting.","PeriodicalId":6454,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"250-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although the early phases of engineering service projects are essential for product success, methods and tools to proactively and comprehensively evaluate the productivity of complex service processes are rare. In this paper the effects of team composition in terms of age diversity and task-related conflict on the outcome of a R&D task are examined in a laboratory experiment. Age heterogeneous and age homogeneous project teams were build and the level of task-related conflict was measured by means of an established instrument as a qualitative team aspect. In the outcome dimension the number of ideas generated during a brainstorming represents the quantitative team performance. To obtain also a quality-oriented view of team performance, the final task results were evaluated by domain experts. This evaluation allows the analysis of the impact of one isolated influence factor on service productivity across the whole chain of value creation within a complex engineering service setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团队组成和任务相关冲突作为工程服务生产力决定因素的调查
虽然工程服务项目的早期阶段对产品的成功至关重要,但主动和全面评估复杂服务过程的生产力的方法和工具很少。本文通过实验室实验考察了年龄差异和任务相关冲突对研发任务结果的影响。建立了年龄异质和年龄同质的项目团队,并通过作为定性团队方面的既定工具来测量任务相关冲突的水平。在结果维度中,头脑风暴中产生的想法的数量代表了量化的团队绩效。为了获得以质量为导向的团队绩效视图,领域专家对最终任务结果进行了评估。该评估允许分析一个孤立的影响因素对复杂工程服务环境中整个价值创造链的服务生产力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extension of the PROMETHEE Method to the Multicriteria Dual Clustering Problem On the Necessity for Improving Effectiveness of Qualification Process for Spare Parts Additive Manufacturing in a Circular Economy Supply Chain Selecting Temporary Flood Shelter Locations by P-Center Model A Feasible Schema Design Strategy for Amazon DynamoDB: A Nested Normal Form Approach Flood Shelters Location Using P-median Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1