Differences in Forestry Students’ Perceptions across Study Years in a Brazilian Undergraduate Program

Javier Arevalo Barbara Jarschel, Sari Pitkänen, Liisa Tahvanainen, Jorma Enkenberg
{"title":"Differences in Forestry Students’ Perceptions across Study Years in a Brazilian Undergraduate Program","authors":"Javier Arevalo Barbara Jarschel,&nbsp;Sari Pitkänen,&nbsp;Liisa Tahvanainen,&nbsp;Jorma Enkenberg","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forestry higher curricula reform is being debated globally. This study examines the views of students on aspects related to forestry education and the profession, focusing on how these views differ across the study years of a higher education forestry program. The objective of the study was to investigate the differences across study years with regard to the students’ forestry-related concerns, the value they give to competencies and experiences, and their preferences with respect to future work and studies. The case study of a 5-year Brazilian undergraduate program was selected, analyzing the responses to a questionnaire of 268 students. Results indicate students in the later years of their study program have a much broader variety of forestry-related concerns, have a greater interest in choosing a different university for doing a Master's degree, and more often consider working as consultants upon graduation. Additionally, students in the later years give a higher importance to competencies related to traditional forestry areas (silviculture, management, policy), computer-related subjects (Forest Information Systems, statistics, computer skills), and generic communication competencies (oral and writing skills). On the contrary, students in the first years give a higher value to environmental and climate change–related issues and to international forestry, as well as to achieving their best. Our findings show there are numerous differences in students’ perceptions across the study years of a program. The consideration of these differences in the reform of forestry and life science curricula, aiming at increasing the attractiveness and effectiveness of the programs, is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Forestry higher curricula reform is being debated globally. This study examines the views of students on aspects related to forestry education and the profession, focusing on how these views differ across the study years of a higher education forestry program. The objective of the study was to investigate the differences across study years with regard to the students’ forestry-related concerns, the value they give to competencies and experiences, and their preferences with respect to future work and studies. The case study of a 5-year Brazilian undergraduate program was selected, analyzing the responses to a questionnaire of 268 students. Results indicate students in the later years of their study program have a much broader variety of forestry-related concerns, have a greater interest in choosing a different university for doing a Master's degree, and more often consider working as consultants upon graduation. Additionally, students in the later years give a higher importance to competencies related to traditional forestry areas (silviculture, management, policy), computer-related subjects (Forest Information Systems, statistics, computer skills), and generic communication competencies (oral and writing skills). On the contrary, students in the first years give a higher value to environmental and climate change–related issues and to international forestry, as well as to achieving their best. Our findings show there are numerous differences in students’ perceptions across the study years of a program. The consideration of these differences in the reform of forestry and life science curricula, aiming at increasing the attractiveness and effectiveness of the programs, is suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林业学生在巴西本科项目中不同学习年限的认知差异
林业高等课程改革正在全球范围内展开讨论。本研究考察了学生对林业教育和职业相关方面的看法,重点关注这些观点在高等教育林业项目的学习年限中的差异。本研究的目的是调查不同学习年限学生对林业相关问题的关注程度、他们对能力和经验的重视程度以及他们对未来工作和学习的偏好。本研究选取巴西一所五年制本科课程为个案,分析268名学生的问卷回答。结果表明,学生在他们的学习计划的后期有更广泛的各种各样的林业相关的关注,有更大的兴趣选择不同的大学攻读硕士学位,更经常考虑毕业后担任顾问。此外,高年级的学生更加重视与传统林业领域(造林、管理、政策)、计算机相关学科(森林信息系统、统计、计算机技能)和通用沟通能力(口头和书面技能)相关的能力。相反,一年级的学生对环境和气候变化相关的问题以及国际林业给予了更高的重视,并尽其所能。我们的研究结果表明,在一个项目的不同学习年限中,学生的认知存在许多差异。建议在林业和生命科学课程改革中考虑这些差异,以提高课程的吸引力和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1