Advances in the Hyphenation of Flow Analysis Techniques with Liquid Separations for Pharmaceutical Analysis

A. Economou
{"title":"Advances in the Hyphenation of Flow Analysis Techniques with Liquid Separations for Pharmaceutical Analysis","authors":"A. Economou","doi":"10.35248/2153-2435.19.10.613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary critically discusses the main advances in the field of flow analysis techniques hyphenated with liquid separations for pharmaceutical analysis over the last 15 years. Flow analysis techniques provide a convenient way to perform chemical assays with significant benefits in terms of rapidity, simplicity and cost of instrumentation, economy, precision, versatility in sample handling and potential for automation. The first-generation flow injection analysis (FIA), developed in the 1970’s, has been supplemented by a host of second-generation and third-generation flow methods developed in the 1990’s and 2000’s such as sequential injection analysis (SIA) and multi-syringe flow injection analysis (MSFIA) [1]. However, the main drawback of these techniques is their limited ability to simultaneously determine several analytes. Therefore, the hyphenation of flow techniques with separation techniques is a very attractive because it enables multi-component analysis. It was the introduction of monolithic columns [2] that has made possible the direct coupling of flow techniques with liquid separations platforms and has led to the development of hyphenated approaches such as FIC, SIC and MSC [3-5]. In all these techniques, a separation column is inserted in the flow path between the point of sample introduction and the detector; the main principles of operation can be found in the relevant literature [3-7]. FIC, SIC and MSC offer distinct advantages in terms of rapidity, simplicity, versatility and capital costs compared with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and have been applied to the determination of a large number of pharmaceuticals [3-5]. When simple mixtures are considered, these hyphenated methods produce results that are comparable to HPLC [8,9]. The main advances in the hyphenation of flow analysis techniques with liquid separations for the purposes of pharmaceutical analysis are identified below.","PeriodicalId":19833,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2153-2435.19.10.613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This commentary critically discusses the main advances in the field of flow analysis techniques hyphenated with liquid separations for pharmaceutical analysis over the last 15 years. Flow analysis techniques provide a convenient way to perform chemical assays with significant benefits in terms of rapidity, simplicity and cost of instrumentation, economy, precision, versatility in sample handling and potential for automation. The first-generation flow injection analysis (FIA), developed in the 1970’s, has been supplemented by a host of second-generation and third-generation flow methods developed in the 1990’s and 2000’s such as sequential injection analysis (SIA) and multi-syringe flow injection analysis (MSFIA) [1]. However, the main drawback of these techniques is their limited ability to simultaneously determine several analytes. Therefore, the hyphenation of flow techniques with separation techniques is a very attractive because it enables multi-component analysis. It was the introduction of monolithic columns [2] that has made possible the direct coupling of flow techniques with liquid separations platforms and has led to the development of hyphenated approaches such as FIC, SIC and MSC [3-5]. In all these techniques, a separation column is inserted in the flow path between the point of sample introduction and the detector; the main principles of operation can be found in the relevant literature [3-7]. FIC, SIC and MSC offer distinct advantages in terms of rapidity, simplicity, versatility and capital costs compared with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and have been applied to the determination of a large number of pharmaceuticals [3-5]. When simple mixtures are considered, these hyphenated methods produce results that are comparable to HPLC [8,9]. The main advances in the hyphenation of flow analysis techniques with liquid separations for the purposes of pharmaceutical analysis are identified below.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动分析技术与液体分离技术在药物分析中的结合研究进展
这篇评论批判性地讨论了流动分析技术领域的主要进展,在过去的15年里,药物分析与液体分离相结合。流动分析技术提供了一种方便的方法来进行化学分析,在快速,简单和仪器成本,经济,精度,样品处理的多功能性和自动化潜力方面具有显着的优势。20世纪70年代发展起来的第一代流动注射分析(FIA),在20世纪90年代和2000年代发展起来的第二代和第三代流动分析方法(如顺序注射分析(SIA)和多注射器流动注射分析(MSFIA)[1]中得到了补充。然而,这些技术的主要缺点是它们同时测定几种分析物的能力有限。因此,流动技术与分离技术的结合是一种非常有吸引力的方法,因为它可以实现多组分分析。正是整体柱[2]的引入,使得流动技术与液体分离平台的直接耦合成为可能,并导致了FIC、SIC和MSC等连接方法的发展[3-5]。在所有这些技术中,在样品引入点和检测器之间的流动路径中插入分离柱;主要操作原理可参考相关文献[3-7]。与高效液相色谱(HPLC)相比,FIC、SIC和MSC在快速、简单、通用性和资金成本方面具有明显的优势,并已应用于大量药物的测定[3-5]。当考虑简单混合物时,这些连字符方法产生的结果与HPLC相当[8,9]。以下是用于药物分析的流动分析技术与液体分离相结合的主要进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solubility Enhancement of Ritonavir: Co-Crystallization Development and validation of UV Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous equation of Aspirin and Omeprazole in tablet dosage form An Archive of 11 years in Pharmaceutical Science Development and Evaluation of Curcumin Floating Tablets Vital Registration in Medication Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1