Nobody's child: the Bank of Greece in the interwar years

Q4 Social Sciences Working Paper - Chr. Michelson Institute Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.52903/wp2021290
Andreas Kakridis
{"title":"Nobody's child: the Bank of Greece in the interwar years","authors":"Andreas Kakridis","doi":"10.52903/wp2021290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither history nor economic historians have been kind to Greece’s central bank in the interwar years. Born at the behest of the League of Nations to help the country secure a new international loan, the Bank of Greece was treated with a mixture of suspicion and hostility. The onset of the Great Depression pitted its statutory objective to defend the exchange rate against the incentive to reflate the domestic economy. Its policy response has generally been criticized as either ineffectual or detrimental: the Bank is accused of having pursued an unduly orthodox and restrictive policy, both during but also after the country’s exit from the gold exchange standard, some going as far as to argue that the 1932 devaluation failed to produce genuine recovery. Relying primarily on archival material, this paper combines qualitative and quantitative sources to revisit the Bank of Greece’s birth and operation during the Great Depression. In doing so, it hopes to put Greece on the map of international comparisons of the Great Depression and debates on the role of the League of Nations, the effectiveness of money doctoring and foreign policy interventions more generally. What is more, the paper seeks to revise several aspects of the conventional narrative surrounding the Bank’s role. First, it argues that monetary policy was neither as ineffective nor as restrictive as critics suggest; this was largely thanks to a continued trickle of foreign lending, but also to the Bank’s own decision to sterilize foreign exchange outflows, thus breaking the ‘rules of the game’. Second, it revisits Greece’s attempt to cling to gold after sterling’s devaluation, a decision routinely denounced as a critical policy mistake. Last but not least, it challenges the notion that Greece constitutes an exception to the rule that wants countries who shed their ‘golden fetters’ recovering faster.","PeriodicalId":35806,"journal":{"name":"Working Paper - Chr. Michelson Institute","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working Paper - Chr. Michelson Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52903/wp2021290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Neither history nor economic historians have been kind to Greece’s central bank in the interwar years. Born at the behest of the League of Nations to help the country secure a new international loan, the Bank of Greece was treated with a mixture of suspicion and hostility. The onset of the Great Depression pitted its statutory objective to defend the exchange rate against the incentive to reflate the domestic economy. Its policy response has generally been criticized as either ineffectual or detrimental: the Bank is accused of having pursued an unduly orthodox and restrictive policy, both during but also after the country’s exit from the gold exchange standard, some going as far as to argue that the 1932 devaluation failed to produce genuine recovery. Relying primarily on archival material, this paper combines qualitative and quantitative sources to revisit the Bank of Greece’s birth and operation during the Great Depression. In doing so, it hopes to put Greece on the map of international comparisons of the Great Depression and debates on the role of the League of Nations, the effectiveness of money doctoring and foreign policy interventions more generally. What is more, the paper seeks to revise several aspects of the conventional narrative surrounding the Bank’s role. First, it argues that monetary policy was neither as ineffective nor as restrictive as critics suggest; this was largely thanks to a continued trickle of foreign lending, but also to the Bank’s own decision to sterilize foreign exchange outflows, thus breaking the ‘rules of the game’. Second, it revisits Greece’s attempt to cling to gold after sterling’s devaluation, a decision routinely denounced as a critical policy mistake. Last but not least, it challenges the notion that Greece constitutes an exception to the rule that wants countries who shed their ‘golden fetters’ recovering faster.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是谁的孩子:两次世界大战期间的希腊银行(Bank of Greece)
在两次世界大战之间的岁月里,无论是历史学家还是经济史学家都对希腊央行不友好。希腊银行是应国际联盟(League of Nations)的要求而成立的,目的是帮助该国获得一笔新的国际贷款,但它受到了怀疑和敌意的双重对待。大萧条(Great Depression)的爆发使其捍卫汇率的法定目标与刺激国内经济再膨胀的动机相矛盾。它的政策反应通常被批评为无效或有害:央行被指责在该国退出金本位制期间和之后都奉行了过度正统和限制性的政策,有些人甚至认为,1932年的货币贬值未能带来真正的复苏。本文主要依靠档案资料,结合定性和定量来源,重新审视希腊银行在大萧条时期的诞生和运作。通过这样做,它希望将希腊置于与大萧条(Great Depression)进行国际比较的地图上,并讨论国际联盟(League of Nations)的作用、货币操纵的有效性以及更普遍的外交政策干预。此外,本文还试图修正围绕世行作用的传统叙述的几个方面。首先,它认为货币政策既不像批评者所说的那样无效,也不像批评者所说的那样具有限制性;这在很大程度上要归功于外国贷款的持续涓涓细流,但也要归功于央行自己决定冲销外汇流出,从而打破了“游戏规则”。其次,它回顾了希腊在英镑贬值后试图坚持持有黄金的做法,这一决定经常被谴责为一个严重的政策错误。最后但并非最不重要的一点是,它挑战了这样一种观点,即希腊是希望摆脱“金镣铐”的国家更快复苏的规则的例外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Working Paper - Chr. Michelson Institute
Working Paper - Chr. Michelson Institute Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneous Districts, Interests, and Trade Policy Disincentive Effects of Unemployment Insurance Benefits An Alternative Measure of Core Inflation: The Trimmed Persistence PCE Price Index Charting the Course: How Does Information about Sea Level Rise Affect the Willingness to Migrate? Exploring country characteristics that encourage emissions reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1