M. Vatan, Melanie Desplat, A. Giambalvo, Gabriel Amorer
{"title":"Underbalanced Jetting in CSG play","authors":"M. Vatan, Melanie Desplat, A. Giambalvo, Gabriel Amorer","doi":"10.2118/191944-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Historically, openhole barefoot completions used in conjunction with cavitation and surging or underreaming techniques, have proven to be an effective way to stimulate coal seam gas wells to increase effective permeability. (Logan et al, 1989). However, despite having a positive impact on production, the unpredictable time required to cavitate and surge the wells can be substantial, sometimes requiring up to 4 weeks to execute required scope. This time consuming technique leaves the operator vulnerable, working in an unstable borehole where fishing operations are common and the outcome of delivering scope is not guaranteed. The main challenges of accurately predicting cost to keep the projects economical, continuing to produce coal fines during cavitating and surging, and continual sloughing are some major drawbacks.\n The other alternative on the market is underreaming, which has its own limitation in relation to the maximum possible enlargement of the borehole or more specifically, the size of the underreamer that can be utilized. Faced with these limitations, there was a significant need for an innovative way to stimulate wells to increase production while minimizing costs.\n This paper introduces the ingenious use of a newly designed jetting tool, with specialized nozzles, to enlarge a borehole size using a combination of air and mist. This case study conducts a lookback on design parameters, cost, and safety improvements introduced by this new technology.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191944-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historically, openhole barefoot completions used in conjunction with cavitation and surging or underreaming techniques, have proven to be an effective way to stimulate coal seam gas wells to increase effective permeability. (Logan et al, 1989). However, despite having a positive impact on production, the unpredictable time required to cavitate and surge the wells can be substantial, sometimes requiring up to 4 weeks to execute required scope. This time consuming technique leaves the operator vulnerable, working in an unstable borehole where fishing operations are common and the outcome of delivering scope is not guaranteed. The main challenges of accurately predicting cost to keep the projects economical, continuing to produce coal fines during cavitating and surging, and continual sloughing are some major drawbacks.
The other alternative on the market is underreaming, which has its own limitation in relation to the maximum possible enlargement of the borehole or more specifically, the size of the underreamer that can be utilized. Faced with these limitations, there was a significant need for an innovative way to stimulate wells to increase production while minimizing costs.
This paper introduces the ingenious use of a newly designed jetting tool, with specialized nozzles, to enlarge a borehole size using a combination of air and mist. This case study conducts a lookback on design parameters, cost, and safety improvements introduced by this new technology.
从历史上看,裸眼光脚完井与造穴、涌流或扩眼技术相结合,已被证明是提高煤层气井有效渗透率的有效方法。(Logan et al, 1989)。然而,尽管对生产有积极的影响,但空化和井喷所需的不可预测的时间可能很长,有时需要长达4周的时间才能完成所需的范围。这种耗时的技术使作业者容易受到伤害,因为作业在不稳定的井眼中,打捞作业很常见,而且无法保证交付范围的结果。一些主要的缺点是,准确预测成本以保持项目的经济性,在空化和突涌期间继续产生煤粉,以及持续的剥落,这些都是主要的挑战。市场上的另一种选择是扩眼,它在最大可能扩大井眼方面有自己的局限性,更具体地说,是可以使用的扩眼器的尺寸。面对这些限制,迫切需要一种创新的方法来增产,同时最大限度地降低成本。本文介绍了一种新设计的喷射工具的巧妙使用,该工具带有专门的喷嘴,可以利用空气和雾的结合来扩大井眼尺寸。本案例研究回顾了该新技术引入的设计参数、成本和安全性改进。