{"title":"How Are Pedagogical Practices Associated with Cheating among Students of Russian Universities","authors":"Egor B. Sagitov, E. Shmeleva","doi":"10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-138-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student academic dishonesty is one of the most serious problems of higher education in Russia and all over the world. This problem became especially severe and widespread during a mass forced transfer to distant education followed by the Covid-19 pandemic. In this regard, it is highly demanded to find affordable measures to combat academic dishonesty, some of which can be implemented at the level of the organization of the learning process. The purpose of this study was to assess and analyze the relationship between the prevalence of passive and active pedagogical practices and academic cheating among students. Based on pieces of evidence, we hypothesized that students are more likely to cheat in conditions where their classes are organized mostly around passive educational practices such as writing down or retelling the course material. The empirical basis of this study is data gathered within the project “Monitoring of education markets and organizations” in spring 2020. Students of full-time bachelor and specialist programs of Russian higher educational institutions were surveyed. The sample includes 17 316 students from 291 Russian universities. Data analysis was carried out using a series of binary multilevel logistic regressions with the sequential addition of groups of individual and group level variables. This study was the first to show the relationship between different pedagogical practices and the risk of student cheating. The main result of this study can be considered a confirmed positive relationship between the prevalence of rewriting and retelling of the course materials during seminars (passive pedagogical practices) and student cheating. The second hypothesis about the relationship between active pedagogical practices and cheating received partial confirmation. The results of this study may be used as a base for recommendations for instructors and administrators of universities to enforce student academic integrity and reduce the prevalence of cheating among them. © 2022. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-138-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
俄罗斯大学的教学实践与学生作弊有何关系
学生学术欺诈是俄罗斯乃至全世界高等教育中最严重的问题之一。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后的大规模被迫转移到远程教育期间,这一问题变得特别严重和普遍。在这方面,迫切需要找到负担得起的措施来打击学术不诚实,其中一些措施可以在学习过程的组织层面实施。本研究的目的是评估和分析学生中被动和主动教学实践的流行与学术作弊之间的关系。根据一些证据,我们假设,在课堂主要围绕被动教育实践(如写下或复述课程材料)组织的情况下,学生更有可能作弊。本研究的实证基础是在2020年春季“教育市场和组织监测”项目中收集的数据。俄罗斯高等教育机构全日制本科和专业课程的学生接受了调查。样本包括来自俄罗斯291所大学的17316名学生。数据分析采用一系列二元多水平逻辑回归,依次添加个体和群体水平变量组。这项研究首次展示了不同的教学实践与学生作弊风险之间的关系。本研究的主要结果可以被认为是在研讨会(被动教学实践)期间重写和复述课程材料的盛行与学生作弊之间的肯定的正相关关系。第二个关于主动教学实践与作弊之间关系的假设得到了部分证实。本研究结果可作为建议大学教师和行政人员加强学生学术诚信,减少学生作弊盛行的基础。©2022。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。