Comparison of oral mifepristone with intracervical foleys catheterisation for induction of labour in term pregnancy: A randomized control trial

Juhi Vipul Amin, A. Gokhale, Vidhi Hemantkumar Shah, Aayushi Jitendra Rajani
{"title":"Comparison of oral mifepristone with intracervical foleys catheterisation for induction of labour in term pregnancy: A randomized control trial","authors":"Juhi Vipul Amin, A. Gokhale, Vidhi Hemantkumar Shah, Aayushi Jitendra Rajani","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral Mifepristone with the efficacy of intracervical Foley catheterisation for induction of labour in term pregnancy. The primary outcome of this study is to compare both methods of induction of labour in terms of induction to delivery interval and the secondary outcome is to compare the two methods in terms of route of delivery, indications of caesarean section and the neonatal outcomes. This study is a randomized control trial conducted from May 2022 to December 2022 in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SSG Hospital, Baroda Medical College. 180 term pregnant patients were enrolled in this study based on a pre-established criteria. Patients were randomised into group A and B. Group A included patients who were given Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg PO followed by per vaginum Tablet Misoprostol and Group B included patients who underwent intracervical Foleys catheterisation followed by placement of per vaginum Tablet Misoprostol. The study concluded that there was significantly decreased induction-delivery interval in women induced with intracervical Foleys catheterisation (Group B) as compared to those given oral Tablet Mifepristone (Group A). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the route of delivery, rate of C Sections and neonatal outcomes.Mifepristone is effective for inducing indicated term pregnancies, despite no decrease in induction delivery interval. Incidence of fetal distress with oral Mifepristone is comparable to intracervical foley's catheterization. Further research is needed to assess tachysystole/hyperstimulation and fetal distress caused by Mifepristone.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral Mifepristone with the efficacy of intracervical Foley catheterisation for induction of labour in term pregnancy. The primary outcome of this study is to compare both methods of induction of labour in terms of induction to delivery interval and the secondary outcome is to compare the two methods in terms of route of delivery, indications of caesarean section and the neonatal outcomes. This study is a randomized control trial conducted from May 2022 to December 2022 in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SSG Hospital, Baroda Medical College. 180 term pregnant patients were enrolled in this study based on a pre-established criteria. Patients were randomised into group A and B. Group A included patients who were given Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg PO followed by per vaginum Tablet Misoprostol and Group B included patients who underwent intracervical Foleys catheterisation followed by placement of per vaginum Tablet Misoprostol. The study concluded that there was significantly decreased induction-delivery interval in women induced with intracervical Foleys catheterisation (Group B) as compared to those given oral Tablet Mifepristone (Group A). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the route of delivery, rate of C Sections and neonatal outcomes.Mifepristone is effective for inducing indicated term pregnancies, despite no decrease in induction delivery interval. Incidence of fetal distress with oral Mifepristone is comparable to intracervical foley's catheterization. Further research is needed to assess tachysystole/hyperstimulation and fetal distress caused by Mifepristone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服米非司酮与宫颈内留置导产术用于足月妊娠引产的比较:一项随机对照试验
本研究的目的是比较口服米非司酮与宫颈内Foley导产术对足月妊娠引产的疗效。本研究的主要结局是比较两种引产方法在引产间隔方面的效果,次要结局是比较两种引产方法在分娩方式、剖宫产指征和新生儿结局方面的效果。本研究是一项随机对照试验,于2022年5月至2022年12月在巴罗达医学院SSG医院妇产科进行,根据预先制定的标准入组180例足月妊娠患者。患者随机分为A组和B组。A组患者给予米非司酮片剂200 mg PO,随后口服阴道片米索前列醇;B组患者接受宫颈内foley导管置入,随后口服阴道片米索前列醇。研究得出结论,与口服米非司酮片(A组)相比,宫颈内Foleys置管(B组)诱导分娩间隔明显缩短。两组在分娩途径、剖宫产率和新生儿结局方面无显著差异。米非司酮是有效的诱导足月妊娠,尽管没有减少引产间隔。口服米非司酮导致胎儿窘迫的发生率与宫颈内foley导管置入相当。需要进一步的研究来评估米非司酮引起的心动过速/过度刺激和胎儿窘迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1