To negotiate or not negotiate: professional boundaries surrounding mobile device usage

IF 1.9 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Community Work & Family Pub Date : 2022-01-04 DOI:10.1080/13668803.2021.2020726
Sharon L. Storch, A. V. O. Juarez-Paz
{"title":"To negotiate or not negotiate: professional boundaries surrounding mobile device usage","authors":"Sharon L. Storch, A. V. O. Juarez-Paz","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2021.2020726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n With the widespread ownership and usage of mobile devices combined with the subsequent challenges usage poses on relationships, this research examines how people negotiate time spent on mobile devices (smartphones and/or tablets) accomplishing professional tasks. Participants in this study were the users of the mobile device within a full-time managerial level position. Diverse organizational representation included, but not limited to health care, engineering, public relations, finance, education, and distribution management industries. Using qualitative methods and semi-structured interviews, data analysis unveiled what negotiation means when using mobile devices in any capacity for professional reasons within the domestic (familial) sphere. Management-level organizational members share how parameters (sometimes called boundaries or borders) are both in and out of their control when using mobile devices to communicate professionally. Within their control was the users’ ability to engage or disengage, while also challenged with situations out of their control due to organizational directives. This research re-conceptualizes the concepts of Clark’s (2000) Work/Family Border Theory. While this data was gathered prior to Covid19, understanding this balance has current and future relevancy from an academic and applied perspective.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Work & Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.2020726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the widespread ownership and usage of mobile devices combined with the subsequent challenges usage poses on relationships, this research examines how people negotiate time spent on mobile devices (smartphones and/or tablets) accomplishing professional tasks. Participants in this study were the users of the mobile device within a full-time managerial level position. Diverse organizational representation included, but not limited to health care, engineering, public relations, finance, education, and distribution management industries. Using qualitative methods and semi-structured interviews, data analysis unveiled what negotiation means when using mobile devices in any capacity for professional reasons within the domestic (familial) sphere. Management-level organizational members share how parameters (sometimes called boundaries or borders) are both in and out of their control when using mobile devices to communicate professionally. Within their control was the users’ ability to engage or disengage, while also challenged with situations out of their control due to organizational directives. This research re-conceptualizes the concepts of Clark’s (2000) Work/Family Border Theory. While this data was gathered prior to Covid19, understanding this balance has current and future relevancy from an academic and applied perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈判还是不谈判:围绕移动设备使用的专业界限
随着移动设备的广泛拥有和使用,以及随之而来的对人际关系的挑战,本研究探讨了人们如何协商在移动设备(智能手机和/或平板电脑)上完成专业任务的时间。本研究的参与者是全职管理级别职位的移动设备用户。不同的组织代表包括但不限于卫生保健、工程、公共关系、金融、教育和分销管理行业。使用定性方法和半结构化访谈,数据分析了谈判意味着什么在使用移动设备在任何专业能力原因在国内(家族)领域。管理级别的组织成员分享在使用移动设备进行专业交流时,参数(有时称为边界或边界)是如何在他们的控制之内和之外的。在他们的控制范围内是用户参与或退出的能力,同时也面临着由于组织指令而无法控制的情况的挑战。本研究重新定义了Clark(2000)工作/家庭边界理论的概念。虽然这些数据是在2019冠状病毒病之前收集的,但从学术和应用的角度来看,理解这种平衡具有当前和未来的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the marital pay gap matter? Women’s family-work experiences by earning pattern and ethnic community ‘It’s just my personality.' How employees make sense of their long work hours in a supportive workplace Rational or emotional decisions? Parents’ nonstandard work hours and the justifications for using informal childcare ‘I walk around with a list in my head’: qualitative research on perceived causes and consequences of the unequal gender division of mental labor in Croatian households Home and away: personal autonomy limitation in the liminal work context of fly-in-fly-out camps and psychological distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1