Springback behavior of tailor rolled blank in U-shape forming

IF 3.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Journal of Iron and Steel Research(International) Pub Date : 2017-08-01 DOI:10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30118-8
Ri-huan Lu , Xiang-hua Liu , Shou-dong Chen , Lu Feng , Xian-lei Hu , Li-zhong Liu
{"title":"Springback behavior of tailor rolled blank in U-shape forming","authors":"Ri-huan Lu ,&nbsp;Xiang-hua Liu ,&nbsp;Shou-dong Chen ,&nbsp;Lu Feng ,&nbsp;Xian-lei Hu ,&nbsp;Li-zhong Liu","doi":"10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30118-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The springback of tailor rolled blanks with quenching and partitioning steels was investigated. In order to find out the springback behavior and related influence factors for the novel sheets, both experimental and simulation methods have been used to compare and analyze the springback characteristics of equal thickness blanks and tailor rolled blanks in U-channel forming. From the results, the overall springback angles of tailor rolled blanks at thin and thick sides are respectively 106. 79° and 99. 705°, which are both lower than those of the corresponding equal thickness blanks. Due to the existence of the thickness transition zone, the stress distribution in thin and thick sides of blanks is changed. The location of dangerous region in thin side of tailor rolled blanks is closer to the end of side, and the thick side moved to the middle of straight wall, which are different with the equal thickness blanks. Afterwards, the released quantitles of tangential stress and strain per unit section of blank are adopted to calculate relative springback angles and give novel evaluation criteria for qualitatively analyzing the amount of springback angles. By comparing the results, it shows that the tangential strain method is more suitable for the actual situation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":64470,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Iron and Steel Research(International)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30118-8","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Iron and Steel Research(International)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1006706X17301188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The springback of tailor rolled blanks with quenching and partitioning steels was investigated. In order to find out the springback behavior and related influence factors for the novel sheets, both experimental and simulation methods have been used to compare and analyze the springback characteristics of equal thickness blanks and tailor rolled blanks in U-channel forming. From the results, the overall springback angles of tailor rolled blanks at thin and thick sides are respectively 106. 79° and 99. 705°, which are both lower than those of the corresponding equal thickness blanks. Due to the existence of the thickness transition zone, the stress distribution in thin and thick sides of blanks is changed. The location of dangerous region in thin side of tailor rolled blanks is closer to the end of side, and the thick side moved to the middle of straight wall, which are different with the equal thickness blanks. Afterwards, the released quantitles of tangential stress and strain per unit section of blank are adopted to calculate relative springback angles and give novel evaluation criteria for qualitatively analyzing the amount of springback angles. By comparing the results, it shows that the tangential strain method is more suitable for the actual situation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轧坯u形成形的回弹行为
研究了淬火配分钢拼轧坯料的回弹性能。为了找出新型板料的回弹特性及其影响因素,采用实验和仿真相结合的方法,对等厚板料和定制轧制板料在u型孔道成形过程中的回弹特性进行了对比分析。结果表明,裁轧薄板和厚板的整体回弹角分别为106。79°和99°。705°,均低于相应等厚坯料。由于厚度过渡区的存在,改变了坯料薄厚两侧的应力分布。与等厚坯料不同的是,裁轧坯料薄侧危险区位置更靠近端部,厚侧危险区位置更靠近直壁中部。然后,采用坯料单位截面切向应力和应变释放量计算相对回弹角,给出了新的评价标准,用于定性分析回弹角的大小。结果表明,切向应变法更适合实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2879
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊最新文献
Influence of laser re-melting and vacuum heat treatment on plasma-sprayed FeCoCrNiAl alloy coatings Modeling deformation resistance for hot rolling based on generalized additive model Effect of solution pH, Cl− concentration and temperature on electrochemical behavior of PH13-8Mo steel in acidic environments Effects of iron compounds on pyrolysis behavior of coals and metallurgical properties of resultant cokes Effect of heat input on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar joints of AISI 316L steel and API X70 high-strength low-alloy steel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1