Differential Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on COVID-19

L. Su, Jiahao Zhang, Nanhui Jiang, Jie Yang, Li He, Qin-jing Xie, Rong Huang, Fang Liu, Ying Feng, K. Kashani, Q. Lu, Zhongyi Sun, Z. Peng
{"title":"Differential Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on COVID-19","authors":"L. Su, Jiahao Zhang, Nanhui Jiang, Jie Yang, Li He, Qin-jing Xie, Rong Huang, Fang Liu, Ying Feng, K. Kashani, Q. Lu, Zhongyi Sun, Z. Peng","doi":"10.4103/2665-9190.329042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial from clinic evidence. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to report the major characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with ACEIs and ARBs and compare the different effects of the two drugs for outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This is a retrospective, two-center case series of 198 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension. Results: Among 198 patients, 58 (29.3%) and 16 (8.1%) were on ARB and ACEI, respectively. Patients who were on ARB or ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower rate of severe illness and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when compared with patients treated with ACEI alone or not receiving RAAS blocker (P < 0.05). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that patients with ARB in their antihypertensive regimen had a trend toward a higher survival rate when compared with individuals without ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–1.02; P = 0.054). The occurrence rates of severe illness, ARDS, and death were similar in the two groups regardless of receiving ACEI. The Cox regression analyses showed a better survival in the ARB group than the ACEI group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00–0.58; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our data may provide that some evidence of using ARB, but not ACEI, was associated with a reduced rate of severe illness and ARDS, indicating their potential protective impact in COVID-19. Further large sample sizes and multiethnic populations are warranted to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":93326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","volume":"60 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2665-9190.329042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial from clinic evidence. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to report the major characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with ACEIs and ARBs and compare the different effects of the two drugs for outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This is a retrospective, two-center case series of 198 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension. Results: Among 198 patients, 58 (29.3%) and 16 (8.1%) were on ARB and ACEI, respectively. Patients who were on ARB or ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower rate of severe illness and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when compared with patients treated with ACEI alone or not receiving RAAS blocker (P < 0.05). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that patients with ARB in their antihypertensive regimen had a trend toward a higher survival rate when compared with individuals without ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–1.02; P = 0.054). The occurrence rates of severe illness, ARDS, and death were similar in the two groups regardless of receiving ACEI. The Cox regression analyses showed a better survival in the ARB group than the ACEI group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00–0.58; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our data may provide that some evidence of using ARB, but not ACEI, was associated with a reduced rate of severe illness and ARDS, indicating their potential protective impact in COVID-19. Further large sample sizes and multiethnic populations are warranted to confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对COVID-19的差异作用
背景:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEIs/ARBs)治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的临床疗效仍存在争议。目的:本研究的目的是报告ACEIs和ARBs治疗COVID-19患者的主要特征和临床结局,并比较两种药物对COVID-19患者结局的不同影响。方法:对198例连续有高血压病史的COVID-19患者进行回顾性、双中心病例分析。结果:198例患者中,ARB和ACEI分别为58例(29.3%)和16例(8.1%)。与单独使用ACEI或未使用RAAS阻滞剂的患者相比,ARB或ACEI/ARB组患者严重疾病和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发生率显著降低(P < 0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,在降压方案中合并ARB的患者与未合并ARB的患者相比,生存率有更高的趋势(校正风险比,0.27;95%置信区间[CI], 0.07-1.02;P = 0.054)。无论是否接受ACEI治疗,两组的严重疾病发生率、ARDS发生率和死亡率相似。Cox回归分析显示,ARB组的生存率高于ACEI组(校正风险比,0.03;95% ci, 0.00-0.58;P = 0.02)。结论:我们的数据可能提供了一些使用ARB(而不是ACEI)与严重疾病和ARDS发生率降低相关的证据,表明它们在COVID-19中具有潜在的保护作用。进一步的大样本量和多民族人群验证了我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nephrology rapid response team in the intensive care unit Management of intensive care unit withdrawal syndrome Effect of Vasopressors and Vasodilators on Kidney Medulla Oxygenation Impaired systemic proteostasis and peripheral immune cell dysfunction in kidney diseases Therapeutic plasma exchange in critical illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1