How can we strengthen the integration of findings in communication sciences?

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Communication Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.24434/j.scoms.2023.01.2728
M. Potthoff
{"title":"How can we strengthen the integration of findings in communication sciences?","authors":"M. Potthoff","doi":"10.24434/j.scoms.2023.01.2728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual studies in the empirical social sciences have limited explanatory power, as they focus on particular aspects of the overarching objects of research. To explain complex communicative phenomena or describe multistep processes, individual findings need to be combined. Often, however, such an integration does not occur, and opportunities to expand the explanatory power of existing results beyond their immediate scope remain unexploited. Drawing from examples in practical research, this paper describes six metatheoretical, methodological, and context factors that explain why a higher degree of co-creation and integration remains unrealized. A good understanding of these factors can easily be translated into measures that can achieve more integration and make our results more impactful. Furthermore, the illustration of the six factors indicates where integrable findings can be found in this fragmented research landscape. The resulting recommendations are made in the hope that integrative work will be upgraded and further established as a methodological niche in the generation of insights.","PeriodicalId":38434,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Communication Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Communication Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2023.01.2728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual studies in the empirical social sciences have limited explanatory power, as they focus on particular aspects of the overarching objects of research. To explain complex communicative phenomena or describe multistep processes, individual findings need to be combined. Often, however, such an integration does not occur, and opportunities to expand the explanatory power of existing results beyond their immediate scope remain unexploited. Drawing from examples in practical research, this paper describes six metatheoretical, methodological, and context factors that explain why a higher degree of co-creation and integration remains unrealized. A good understanding of these factors can easily be translated into measures that can achieve more integration and make our results more impactful. Furthermore, the illustration of the six factors indicates where integrable findings can be found in this fragmented research landscape. The resulting recommendations are made in the hope that integrative work will be upgraded and further established as a methodological niche in the generation of insights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何加强传播科学研究成果的整合?
实证社会科学中的个体研究具有有限的解释力,因为它们专注于研究总体对象的特定方面。为了解释复杂的交际现象或描述多步骤的过程,个体的发现需要结合起来。然而,这样的整合通常不会发生,而且扩大现有结果的解释能力超出其直接范围的机会仍然没有得到利用。从实践研究的例子中,本文描述了六个元理论、方法和背景因素,解释了为什么更高程度的共同创造和整合仍然没有实现。对这些因素的良好理解可以很容易地转化为能够实现更多整合并使我们的结果更有影响力的措施。此外,这六个因素的说明表明,在这个碎片化的研究景观中,可以找到可整合的发现。提出这些建议的目的是希望提高综合工作的水平,并进一步确立其在产生见解方面的方法学地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Communication Sciences
Studies in Communication Sciences Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Botlitica: A generative AI-based tool to assist journalists in navigating political propaganda campaigns Iconic image clusters: Significance, structure, and analysis Images, clusters and types – Making sense of (large) image corpora and related practices in and with digital media From party to pandemic – Frames and metaphors in the news coverage of the COVID-19 outbreak in Austria Image types revisited. A texto-material approach for creating image types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1