Tragal cartilage versus tragal perichondrial graft in tympanoplasty type 1

M. Hasan, S. Mekhemer, Huda Ibraheim, Bothina Mohamed
{"title":"Tragal cartilage versus tragal perichondrial graft in tympanoplasty type 1","authors":"M. Hasan, S. Mekhemer, Huda Ibraheim, Bothina Mohamed","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_86_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Chronic suppurative otitis media is a common health problem. It causes tympanic membrane perforation, otorrhea, and conductive hearing loss. Type 1 tympanoplasty is a common otological procedure done to eliminate the infection and improve hearing and quality of life. Objective To compare graft uptake and hearing outcome using autologous grafts (tragal cartilage, temporalis fascia (control group), and tragal perichondrium) in tympanoplasty type 1. Patients and methods A total of 45 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media were included in this comparative study. They were divided into three groups, with 15 patients in each group: group A received tragal cartilage graft, group B received temporalis fascia graft (control group), and group C received tragal perichondrial graft. Patients were subjected to detailed history taking, proper clinical examination, routine blood investigations, audiometry, and tympanometry preoperatively. They underwent underlay tympanoplasty type 1. Postoperative follow-up was done after 3 months by otoscopy to evaluate graft uptake and hearing outcome by audiometry, and results were compared. Results Graft uptake was 93.3% in the cartilage group, 73.3% in fascia (control) group, and 66.7% in perichondrium group. There was hearing improvement in cartilage group than fascia (control) group, which was better than perichondrium group, with no statistically significant difference among the three groups regarding graft uptake (P=0.188) or hearing gain. Conclusion Graft uptake and hearing improvement were better with tragal cartilage graft in comparison with fascia (control group) and perichondrium grafts, with no statistically significant difference between them.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":"2 1","pages":"462 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_86_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Chronic suppurative otitis media is a common health problem. It causes tympanic membrane perforation, otorrhea, and conductive hearing loss. Type 1 tympanoplasty is a common otological procedure done to eliminate the infection and improve hearing and quality of life. Objective To compare graft uptake and hearing outcome using autologous grafts (tragal cartilage, temporalis fascia (control group), and tragal perichondrium) in tympanoplasty type 1. Patients and methods A total of 45 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media were included in this comparative study. They were divided into three groups, with 15 patients in each group: group A received tragal cartilage graft, group B received temporalis fascia graft (control group), and group C received tragal perichondrial graft. Patients were subjected to detailed history taking, proper clinical examination, routine blood investigations, audiometry, and tympanometry preoperatively. They underwent underlay tympanoplasty type 1. Postoperative follow-up was done after 3 months by otoscopy to evaluate graft uptake and hearing outcome by audiometry, and results were compared. Results Graft uptake was 93.3% in the cartilage group, 73.3% in fascia (control) group, and 66.7% in perichondrium group. There was hearing improvement in cartilage group than fascia (control) group, which was better than perichondrium group, with no statistically significant difference among the three groups regarding graft uptake (P=0.188) or hearing gain. Conclusion Graft uptake and hearing improvement were better with tragal cartilage graft in comparison with fascia (control group) and perichondrium grafts, with no statistically significant difference between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型鼓室成形术中耳屏软骨与耳屏软骨周移植的比较
慢性化脓性中耳炎是一种常见的健康问题。它会导致鼓膜穿孔、耳漏和传导性听力损失。1型鼓室成形术是一种常见的耳科手术,用于消除感染,改善听力和生活质量。目的比较自体鼓室软骨、颞筋膜(对照组)和鼓室软骨膜在1型鼓室成形术中的吸收情况和听力效果。患者与方法选择45例慢性化脓性中耳炎患者作为对照研究对象。分为3组,每组15例:A组行耳屏软骨移植,B组行颞筋膜移植(对照组),C组行耳屏硬膜周移植。术前对患者进行详细的病史记录,适当的临床检查,常规血液检查,听力测定和鼓室测量。他们接受了1型鼓室成形术。术后随访3个月,通过耳镜评估移植物摄取和听力学听力结果,并比较结果。结果软骨组移植骨摄取率为93.3%,筋膜组(对照组)为73.3%,软骨膜组为66.7%。软骨组听力改善优于筋膜组(对照组),且优于软骨膜组,三组间移植物摄取及听力增加差异无统计学意义(P=0.188)。结论耳膜软骨移植比筋膜(对照组)和软骨膜移植对听力的改善和吸收效果更好,两者间差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1