Dosimetric Effects Due to Inter-Observer Variability of Organ Contouring When Utilizing a Knowledge-Based Planning System for Prostate Cancer

Han Liu, Christopher Amaloo, B. Sintay, D. Wiant
{"title":"Dosimetric Effects Due to Inter-Observer Variability of Organ Contouring When Utilizing a Knowledge-Based Planning System for Prostate Cancer","authors":"Han Liu, Christopher Amaloo, B. Sintay, D. Wiant","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2021.102005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Radiotherapy is a widely accepted standard of care for early-stage prostate \ncancer, and it is believed that the plan quality and treatment outcome are \nassociated with contour accuracy of both the target and organs-at-risk (OAR). \nThe purposes of this study are to 1) assess geometric and dosimetric \nuncertainties due to inter-observer contour variabilities and 2) evaluate the \neffectiveness of geometric indicators to predict target dosimetry in prostate \nradiotherapy. Methods: Twenty prostate patients were selected for this \nretrospective study. Five experienced clinicians created unique structure sets \ncontaining prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum for each patient. A \nfully automated script and knowledge-based planning routine were utilized to \ncreate standardized and unbiased plans that could be used to evaluate changes \nin isodose distributions due to inter-observer variability in structure \nsegmentation. Plans were created on a “gold-standard” structure set, as well as \non each of the user-defined structure sets. Results: Inter-observer \nvariability of contours during structure segmentation was very low for clearly \ndefined organs such as the bladder but increased for organs without \nwell-defined borders (prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum). For plans \ngenerated with the user-defined structure sets, strong/moderate correlations \nwere observed between the geometric indicators for target structure agreement \nand target coverage for both low-risk and intermediate-risk patient groups, \nwhile OAR indicators showed no correlation to final dosimetry. Conclusions: Target delineation is crucial in order to maintain adequate dosimetric coverage \nregardless of the associated inter-observer uncertainties in OAR contours that \nhad a limited impact upon final dosimetry.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2021.102005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Radiotherapy is a widely accepted standard of care for early-stage prostate cancer, and it is believed that the plan quality and treatment outcome are associated with contour accuracy of both the target and organs-at-risk (OAR). The purposes of this study are to 1) assess geometric and dosimetric uncertainties due to inter-observer contour variabilities and 2) evaluate the effectiveness of geometric indicators to predict target dosimetry in prostate radiotherapy. Methods: Twenty prostate patients were selected for this retrospective study. Five experienced clinicians created unique structure sets containing prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum for each patient. A fully automated script and knowledge-based planning routine were utilized to create standardized and unbiased plans that could be used to evaluate changes in isodose distributions due to inter-observer variability in structure segmentation. Plans were created on a “gold-standard” structure set, as well as on each of the user-defined structure sets. Results: Inter-observer variability of contours during structure segmentation was very low for clearly defined organs such as the bladder but increased for organs without well-defined borders (prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum). For plans generated with the user-defined structure sets, strong/moderate correlations were observed between the geometric indicators for target structure agreement and target coverage for both low-risk and intermediate-risk patient groups, while OAR indicators showed no correlation to final dosimetry. Conclusions: Target delineation is crucial in order to maintain adequate dosimetric coverage regardless of the associated inter-observer uncertainties in OAR contours that had a limited impact upon final dosimetry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当使用基于知识的前列腺癌计划系统时,由于器官轮廓的观察者间变异性的剂量学效应
目的:放疗是一种被广泛接受的早期前列腺癌的治疗标准,人们认为放疗计划的质量和治疗结果与靶器官和危险器官(OAR)的轮廓准确性有关。本研究的目的是1)评估几何和剂量学的不确定性,因为观察者之间的轮廓变化,2)评估几何指标预测前列腺放疗靶剂量的有效性。方法:选取20例前列腺病患者进行回顾性研究。五位经验丰富的临床医生为每位患者创建了独特的结构集,包括前列腺、精囊、膀胱和直肠。一个完全自动化的脚本和基于知识的计划程序被用来创建标准化和无偏的计划,可用于评估由于结构分割的观察者间可变性而导致的等剂量分布的变化。计划是在“黄金标准”结构集上创建的,以及在每个用户定义的结构集上创建的。结果:在结构分割过程中,观察者间轮廓的变异性对于边界明确的器官(如膀胱)非常低,而对于边界不明确的器官(如前列腺、精囊和直肠)则增加。对于使用用户定义结构集生成的计划,低风险和中风险患者组的目标结构一致性几何指标与目标覆盖率之间存在强/中等相关性,而OAR指标与最终剂量学没有相关性。结论:目标圈定对于保持足够的剂量覆盖至关重要,无论相关的观察者之间的不确定性对最终剂量测量的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Monitor Units and Gamma Pass Rate for 6 MV and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beams in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) The Journey of SRS: An Initial Experience of Starting Sterotactic Radiosurgery Facility at Purbanchal Cancer Hospital—First in Nepal Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME) with Peroneal Nerve Compresion: A Case Report Dosimetric Study of the Effect of Calypso-Compatible Couch Top for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Radiation-Associated Cardiotoxicity during Breast Cancer Treatment with Ionizing Radiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1