Irreconcilable Differences: Gender and the Failures of Heterosexual Love in The Faerie Queene, Books III and IV

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717095
D. St Hilaire
{"title":"Irreconcilable Differences: Gender and the Failures of Heterosexual Love in The Faerie Queene, Books III and IV","authors":"D. St Hilaire","doi":"10.1086/717095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many readers of The Faerie Queene have traced a shift from private to public virtues in the middle books of the poem, this article argues that the projects of Books III and IV run aground on the poem’s inability to make private, erotic happiness compatible with the social order it is supposed to produce. The primary tension in Books III and IV of the poem grows out of the attempt to ground public virtues in the private experience of erotic love. More specifically, the difficulty Spenser faces throughout the central books of the poem derives from his attempt to reconcile heterosexual love in a patriarchal context—that is, intimate relationships between a dominant and a subordinate party—with stable social relations. Both Books III and IV attempt to generate a form of love that is egalitarian as a way to end interpersonal violence, but in both books the project fails to the extent that The Faerie Queene cannot imagine a world in which women are full subjects rather than objects of the social order they help to generate.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While many readers of The Faerie Queene have traced a shift from private to public virtues in the middle books of the poem, this article argues that the projects of Books III and IV run aground on the poem’s inability to make private, erotic happiness compatible with the social order it is supposed to produce. The primary tension in Books III and IV of the poem grows out of the attempt to ground public virtues in the private experience of erotic love. More specifically, the difficulty Spenser faces throughout the central books of the poem derives from his attempt to reconcile heterosexual love in a patriarchal context—that is, intimate relationships between a dominant and a subordinate party—with stable social relations. Both Books III and IV attempt to generate a form of love that is egalitarian as a way to end interpersonal violence, but in both books the project fails to the extent that The Faerie Queene cannot imagine a world in which women are full subjects rather than objects of the social order they help to generate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可调和的差异:《仙后》第三、四卷中的性别与异性恋的失败
虽然《仙后》的许多读者在这首诗的中间几卷中发现了从私人美德到公共美德的转变,但本文认为,第三卷和第四卷的计划搁浅了,因为这首诗无法使私人的、色情的幸福与它应该产生的社会秩序相适应。这首诗的第三和第四卷的主要张力源于试图将公共美德建立在情爱的私人经验之上。更具体地说,斯宾塞在整首诗的中心部分所面临的困难来自于他试图调和父权背景下的异性恋——即主从双方之间的亲密关系——与稳定的社会关系。第三卷和第四卷都试图创造一种平等主义的爱,作为结束人际暴力的一种方式,但在这两本书中,这个项目都失败了,因为《仙后》无法想象一个世界,在这个世界里,女性是完全的主体,而不是她们帮助创造的社会秩序的客体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter “Soveraigne place”: Spenser with Henri Lefebvre Thinking through Symbionts: Spenser with Donna Haraway On Dissonance and Late Style: Spenser with Theodor W. Adorno In the Person of the Author: A Response to “Imagined Companions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1