Evaluation of recent combined global geopotential models in Brazil

IF 0.9 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Geodetic Science Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.1515/jogs-2018-0008
E. Nicacio, R. Dalazoana, S. Freitas
{"title":"Evaluation of recent combined global geopotential models in Brazil","authors":"E. Nicacio, R. Dalazoana, S. Freitas","doi":"10.1515/jogs-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a quantitative analysis of the adequacy of the main currently existing combined Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) for modeling normal-geoid heights throughout Brazil. As major advances have been reached since mid-2016 in the combined GGMs elaboration and development, the main objective of this analysis is to verify if, in fact, the most recent models present superior or equivalent performance to the most performant previous models. The analysis was based on comparisons between normal-geoid height values obtained fromGNSS/leveling solutions and values calculated from GGMs XGM2016, GOCO05C, EIGEN-6C4 and EGM2008, according to different geopotential functionals - geoid height and height anomaly - and in different degrees of development, always through the relative method. This procedure was applied to 997 stations which carry information of both ellipsoidal and normal-orthometric heights, located all over Brazil. As a main result, it was observed the superior performance of the recent combined GGMs, GOCO05C and XGM2016, when compared to the older models, EIGEN-6C4 and EGM2008, when all of them are developed up to degree 720, the maximum degree of the recent models; and a approximate equality of results when all of the models are used in their individual maximum degrees.","PeriodicalId":44569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodetic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a quantitative analysis of the adequacy of the main currently existing combined Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) for modeling normal-geoid heights throughout Brazil. As major advances have been reached since mid-2016 in the combined GGMs elaboration and development, the main objective of this analysis is to verify if, in fact, the most recent models present superior or equivalent performance to the most performant previous models. The analysis was based on comparisons between normal-geoid height values obtained fromGNSS/leveling solutions and values calculated from GGMs XGM2016, GOCO05C, EIGEN-6C4 and EGM2008, according to different geopotential functionals - geoid height and height anomaly - and in different degrees of development, always through the relative method. This procedure was applied to 997 stations which carry information of both ellipsoidal and normal-orthometric heights, located all over Brazil. As a main result, it was observed the superior performance of the recent combined GGMs, GOCO05C and XGM2016, when compared to the older models, EIGEN-6C4 and EGM2008, when all of them are developed up to degree 720, the maximum degree of the recent models; and a approximate equality of results when all of the models are used in their individual maximum degrees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对巴西最近联合全球地势模式的评价
摘要本文的目的是对目前主要的全球组合地势模型(GGMs)在巴西各地法向大地水准面高度建模中的充分性进行定量分析。自2016年中期以来,在综合GGMs的阐述和开发方面取得了重大进展,本分析的主要目的是验证最近的模型是否比以前性能最好的模型表现出更好或同等的性能。根据不同的大地水准面高程和高程异常位势函数,在不同的发育程度下,将gnss /水准解决方案得到的正大地水准面高程值与GGMs XGM2016、GOCO05C、EIGEN-6C4和EGM2008计算的正大地水准面高程值进行对比分析,采用相对法。这一程序应用于巴西全国997个载有椭球高度和正交高度资料的台站。研究结果表明,GOCO05C和XGM2016组合ggm的性能优于EIGEN-6C4和EGM2008,均达到了近年组合ggm的最大开发度720度;当所有模型都在各自的最大程度上使用时,结果近似相等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodetic Science
Journal of Geodetic Science REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Displacement analysis of the October 30, 2020 (M w = 6.9), Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake A field test of compact active transponders for InSAR geodesy Estimating the slip rate in the North Tabriz Fault using focal mechanism data and GPS velocity field Simulating VLBI observations to BeiDou and Galileo satellites in L-band for frame ties On initial data in adjustments of the geometric levelling networks (on the mean of paired observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1